Does mini-incision donor nephrectomy improve quality of life in living kidney donors?

被引:8
|
作者
Schnitzbauer, Andreas A.
Hornung, Matthias
Seidel, Ulrike
Krueger, Bernd
Kraemer, Bernhard K.
Schlitt, Hans J.
Obed, Aiman
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Med Ctr, Dept Nephrol, D-8400 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
living donor; mini-incision; retroperitoneal; quality of life;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00631.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Living kidney donation helps to avoid or reduce the time period of dialysis and on waiting lists in patients requiring a new organ. Mini-incision donor nephrectomy (MIDN) shows to result in better clinical outcome in comparison with traditional open donor nephrectomy (ODN). This study was performed to evaluate the impact of different surgical procedures on the quality of life (QoL) in patients that underwent donor nephrectomy. Methods: The aim of the study was to detect differences in QoL assessed with the Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire between MIDN (n = 34) and ODN (n = 36). Furthermore, the development of QoL from prior to surgery until one yr afterwards, as well as outcomes of QoL in comparison with norm-based scores was investigated. Results: Sixty-one of 70 patients, which is 87% (MIDN: 86%, ODN: 88%) resent a whole set questionnaires. QoL was similar at all time-points (prior to surgery, one wk, three months and one yr) in both groups. A tendency of better QoL in MIDN (Bodily Pain) after one wk was detectable (p = 0.075). Physical Component Summaries (PCS) significantly decreased from prior to surgery until one wk after surgery (p = 0.001) and improved significantly until three months (MIDN: p = 0.006, ODN: p = 0.001) and also until one yr after surgery (p = 0.002). Mental Component Summaries (MCS) were stable throughout the whole investigated time period. In comparison with norm-based scores, MIDN (p = 0.005) and ODN (p = 0.001) showed significantly higher PCS prior to, lower scores one wk after (p = 0.001), similar scores three months after and better scores (MIDN: p = 0.023, ODN: 0.015) one yr after surgery. Mental Component Scores were similar in both prior to and one wk after surgery. After three months and one yr scores were significantly better in MIDN (three months: p = 0.049, one yr: p = 0.037) and ODN (three months: 0.020, one yr: 0.073). Conclusion: Quality of life after living donor nephrectomy is not influenced by the surgical technique. Nevertheless the standardized instrument of the SF-36v2 Health Survey is a useful, practicable and universally interpretable tool to gain and estimate recovery from surgical procedures in the perioperative period and its development thereafter.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 240
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of life following living donor nephrectomy comparing classical flank incision and anterior vertical mini-incision
    Steffan Jackobs
    Thomas Becker
    Rainer Lück
    Mark D. Jäger
    Björn Nashan
    Wilfried Gwinner
    Anke Schwarz
    Jürgen Klempnauer
    Michael Neipp
    World Journal of Urology, 2005, 23 : 343 - 348
  • [2] Quality of life following living donor nephrectomy comparing classical flank incision and anterior vertical mini-incision
    Jackobs, S
    Becker, T
    Lück, R
    Jäger, MD
    Nashan, B
    Gwinner, W
    Schwarz, A
    Klempnauer, J
    Neipp, M
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 23 (05) : 343 - 348
  • [3] Living donor nephrectomy: Flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision
    Neipp, M
    Jackobs, S
    Becker, T
    Vilsendorf, AMZ
    Winny, M
    Lueck, R
    Klempnauer, J
    Nashan, B
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (09) : 1356 - 1361
  • [4] Anterior vertical mini-incision vs. retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in living kidney donation: a prospective study on donors' quality of life and clinical outcome
    Kroencke, Sylvia
    Schulz, Karl-Heinz
    Nashan, Bjoern
    Koch, Martina
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (11) : 1029 - 1038
  • [5] Pararectal mini-incision for strictly retroperitroneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation
    Schnitzbauer, A. A.
    Loss, M.
    Hornung, M.
    Farkas, S.
    Kraemer, B.
    Wieland, W.
    Schlitt, H. J.
    Obed, A.
    UROLOGE, 2006, 45 (09): : 1170 - 1175
  • [6] Mini-incision for strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation vs flank incision
    Schnitzbauer, A. A.
    Loss, M.
    Hornung, M.
    Glockzin, G.
    Mantouvalou, L.
    Krueger, B.
    Kraemer, B. K.
    Schlitt, H. J.
    Obed, A.
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 (10) : 2948 - 2952
  • [7] A single center approach to living kidney donation using laparoscopic and open mini-incision donor nephrectomy
    Kruszyna, Tomasz W.
    Klassen, Denis
    Bonjer, Jaap H.
    Kompatzki, Alvaro
    Storsley, Leroy
    Walsh, Mark J.
    Molinari, Michele
    Nashan, Bjorn
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 : 233 - 233
  • [8] Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy
    Perry, KT
    Freedland, SJ
    Hu, JC
    Phelan, MW
    Kristo, B
    Gritsch, AH
    Rajfer, J
    Schulam, PG
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06): : 2018 - 2021
  • [9] Mini-Incision Donor Nephrectomy Techniques: A Systematic Review
    Aboutaleb, Esam
    Herbert, Paul
    Crane, Jeremy
    Hakim, Nadey
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 8 (03) : 189 - 195
  • [10] Robotic Versus Open Mini-Incision Living Donor Nephrectomy: Single Center Experience
    Lee, Seung Duk
    Khan, Aamir
    Sharma, Amit
    Cotterell, Adrian
    Kumaran, Vinay
    Bruno, David
    Levy, Marlon
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (09) : S111 - S111