Complications of sedation with midazolam in the intensive care unit and a comparison with other sedative regimens

被引:161
|
作者
Shafer, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
sedation; intensive care; midazolam; intravenous; complications; propofol; lorazepam; critical care; mechanical ventilation; withdrawal; tolerance; infusion;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-199805000-00034
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the various complications that have reported with use of midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data Sources: Publications in scientific literature. Data Extraction: Computer search of the literature. Synthesis: Sedation is required in the ICU in order for patients to tolerate noxious stimuli, particularly mechanical ventilation. Under-and oversedation can lead to complications. To sedate patients in the ICU, midazolam is commonly administered via titrated, continuous infusions. Cardiorespiratory effects tend to be minimal; however, hypotension can occur in hypovolemic patients. Prolonged sedation after cessation of the midazolam infusion may be caused by altered kinetics of the drug in critically ill patients or by accumulation of active metabolites. In addition, paradoxical and psychotic reactions have been rarely reported. Tolerance and tachyphylaxis may occur, particularly with longer-term infusions (>3 days). Benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome has also been associated with high dose/long-term midazolam infusions. Compared with propofol infusions, midazolam infusions have been associated with a decreased occurrence of hypotension but a more variable time course for recovery of function after the cessation of the infusion. Lorazepam is a more cost-effective choice for longterm (>24 hrs) sedation. Conclusion: Continuous infusion midazolam provides effective sedation in the ICU with few complications overall, especially when the dose is titrated.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 956
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit
    RM Venn
    RM Grounds
    Critical Care, 5 (Suppl 1):
  • [32] Long-term sedation in intensive care unit: a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam
    Malcie Mesnil
    Xavier Capdevila
    Sophie Bringuier
    Pierre-Olivier Trine
    Yoan Falquet
    Jonathan Charbit
    Jean-Paul Roustan
    Gerald Chanques
    Samir Jaber
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2011, 37 : 933 - 941
  • [33] Long-term sedation in intensive care unit: a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam
    Mesnil, Malcie
    Capdevila, Xavier
    Bringuier, Sophie
    Trine, Pierre-Olivier
    Falquet, Yoan
    Charbit, Jonathan
    Roustan, Jean-Paul
    Chanques, Gerald
    Jaber, Samir
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 (06) : 933 - 941
  • [34] MIDAZOLAM IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT
    DIRKSEN, MSC
    VREE, TB
    DRIESSEN, JJ
    DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY, 1986, 20 (10): : 805 - 806
  • [35] Use of sedative medications in the intensive care unit
    Nasraway, SA
    SEMINARS IN RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 22 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [36] Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit
    MacKillop, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (02) : 304 - 304
  • [37] Optimizing sedative use in the intensive care unit
    Ferguson, ND
    Mehta, S
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (01) : 44 - 47
  • [38] KETAMINE AS A SEDATIVE IN THE TRAUMA INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Mcquigg, Megan
    Lauer, Brian
    Bush, Weston
    Naylor, Douglas
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2025, 53 (01)
  • [39] Optimizing sedative use in the intensive care unit
    Niall D. Ferguson
    Sangeeta Mehta
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2002, 28 : 44 - 47
  • [40] Sedation versus no sedation in the intensive-care unit
    Iyer, Vivek N.
    LANCET, 2010, 375 (9721): : 1159 - 1160