Complications of sedation with midazolam in the intensive care unit and a comparison with other sedative regimens

被引:161
|
作者
Shafer, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
sedation; intensive care; midazolam; intravenous; complications; propofol; lorazepam; critical care; mechanical ventilation; withdrawal; tolerance; infusion;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-199805000-00034
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the various complications that have reported with use of midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data Sources: Publications in scientific literature. Data Extraction: Computer search of the literature. Synthesis: Sedation is required in the ICU in order for patients to tolerate noxious stimuli, particularly mechanical ventilation. Under-and oversedation can lead to complications. To sedate patients in the ICU, midazolam is commonly administered via titrated, continuous infusions. Cardiorespiratory effects tend to be minimal; however, hypotension can occur in hypovolemic patients. Prolonged sedation after cessation of the midazolam infusion may be caused by altered kinetics of the drug in critically ill patients or by accumulation of active metabolites. In addition, paradoxical and psychotic reactions have been rarely reported. Tolerance and tachyphylaxis may occur, particularly with longer-term infusions (>3 days). Benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome has also been associated with high dose/long-term midazolam infusions. Compared with propofol infusions, midazolam infusions have been associated with a decreased occurrence of hypotension but a more variable time course for recovery of function after the cessation of the infusion. Lorazepam is a more cost-effective choice for longterm (>24 hrs) sedation. Conclusion: Continuous infusion midazolam provides effective sedation in the ICU with few complications overall, especially when the dose is titrated.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 956
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of midazolam, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine sedation in intensive care unit
    Turan, G.
    Dincer, E.
    Ozgultekin, A.
    Baskilic, N.
    Kucuk, H.
    Akgun, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 174 - 175
  • [2] COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION IN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT PATIENTS
    RONAN, KP
    GALLAGHER, TJ
    GEORGE, B
    HAMBY, B
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (02) : 286 - 293
  • [3] Comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation of eclampsia patients in the intensive care unit
    Esmaolglu, Aliye
    Ulgey, Ayse
    Akin, Aynur
    Boyaci, Adern
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 24 (04) : 551 - 555
  • [4] Sedation with intravenous midazolam in the pediatric intensive care unit
    Notterman, DA
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 1997, 36 (08) : 449 - 454
  • [5] LONG-TERM SEDATION IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL WITH MIDAZOLAM
    WILDERSMITH, OHG
    BORGEAT, A
    MOREL, DR
    SUTER, PM
    ANAESTHESIST, 1993, 42 (01): : 47 - 47
  • [6] LONG-TERM SEDATION IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - A COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL WITH MIDAZOLAM
    BEYER, R
    SEYDE, WC
    ANAESTHESIST, 1992, 41 (06): : 335 - 341
  • [7] ISOFLURANE COMPARED WITH MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT
    KONG, KL
    WILLATTS, SM
    PRYSROBERTS, C
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 298 (6683): : 1277 - 1280
  • [8] PROPOFOL FOR LONG-TERM SEDATION IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - A COMPARISON WITH PAPAVERETUM AND MIDAZOLAM
    HARRIS, CE
    GROUNDS, RM
    MURRAY, AM
    LUMLEY, J
    ROYSTON, D
    MORGAN, M
    ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (05) : 366 - 372
  • [9] Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
    Ng, Eugene
    Taddio, Anna
    Ohlsson, Arne
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (01):
  • [10] Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
    Ng, E.
    Taddio, A.
    Ohlsson, A.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (06):