Nipple-areola complex reconstruction in transgender patients undergoing mastectomy with free nipple grafts: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes

被引:10
|
作者
Bustos, Samyd S. [1 ,2 ]
Kuruoglu, Doga [1 ]
Yan, Maria [1 ]
Bustos, Valeria P. [3 ]
Forte, Antonio J. [4 ]
Ciudad, Pedro [5 ]
Kim, Esther A. [6 ]
Del Corral, Gabriel A. [7 ]
Manrique, Oscar J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Ctr Regenerat Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Fac Med, Bogota, DC, Colombia
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[5] Arzobispo Loayza Natl Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Burn Surg, Lima, Peru
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Transgender persons; nipples; chest wall; plastic surgery; masculinity; TO-MALE TRANSSEXUALS; GENDER-AFFIRMING SURGERY; WALL CONTOURING SURGERY; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; CHEST RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.21037/atm-20-4522
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction in transgender and gender non-binary (TGNB) individuals undergoing chest wall masculinization surgery is critical for adequate satisfaction and aesthetic results. Here, we conducted a systematic review to find the various techniques and outcomes of NAC reconstruction in double-incision mastectomy and free nipple grafts (DIM-FNG). A comprehensive search of several databases was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. We included studies that described the NAC reconstruction technique after DIM-FNG, and evaluated the surgical outcomes, or satisfaction, or aesthetic results after a minimum duration of follow-up of 6 months. Studies were assessed for risk of bias. A qualitative synthesis was performed. A total of 19 studies, comprising 1,587 patients (3,174 breasts), were included. There was a total of 14 studies using the conventional FNG technique, 4 describing new approaches for NAC reconstruction in FNG and 1 study comparing the conventional FNG technique to another alternative technique. A total of 1,347 patients underwent DIM-FNG with conventional FNG and 240 underwent alternative techniques for NAC reconstruction after DIM-FNG. Postoperative complications were low, and satisfaction was high for conventional and alternative techniques. Newer techniques aim to reshape the new NACs in an oval shape, reduce nipple size and place the NACs using the pectoralis major lateral and inferior borders as reference. In addition, a horizontal oval incision at the recipient site may avoid an undesired vertical NAC.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tattooing of the nipple-areola complex: review of outcome in 40 patients
    El-Ali, K.
    Dalal, M.
    Kat, C. C.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2006, 59 (10): : 1052 - 1057
  • [42] Applicability of the nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy - A prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients
    Schecter, AK
    Freeman, MB
    Giri, D
    Sabo, E
    Weinzweig, J
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 56 (05) : 498 - 504
  • [43] Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: A critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex
    Munhoz, Alexandre Mendonca
    Aldrighi, Claudia Maria
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 118 (05) : 1274 - 1275
  • [44] Reply: Modified Nipple Flap with Free Areolar Graft for Component Nipple-Areola Complex Construction: Outcomes with a Novel Technique for Chest Wall Reconstruction in Transgender Men
    Frey, Jordan D.
    Motosko, Catherine C.
    Poudrier, Grace
    Saia, Whitney V.
    Wilson, Stelios C.
    Yu, Jessie Z.
    Hazen, Alexes
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (06) : 1310E - 1311E
  • [45] Imaging and clinical predictors for nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement in breast cancer patients undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM)
    Lerena, I. Cebrecos
    Boada, D.
    Caparros, X.
    Ganau, S.
    Bargallo, X.
    Ubeda, B.
    Descarrega, J.
    Raigosa, M.
    Yoon, T. S.
    Santfeliu, E.
    Gonzalez, B.
    Munoz, M.
    Prat, A.
    Torne, A.
    Carmona, F.
    Fontdevila, J.
    Alonso, I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 138 : S118 - S118
  • [46] Bipedicled Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Traditional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Comparison of 2 Alternative Techniques in Order to Save Nipple-Areola Complex
    Falco, Giuseppe
    Curcio, Annalisa
    Marongiu, Francesco
    Buggi, Federico
    Mingozzi, Matteo
    Mele, Simone
    Ferrari, Guglielmo
    Folli, Secondo
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (04) : 366 - 374
  • [47] When can the nipple-areola complex safely be spared during mastectomy?
    Jensen, JA
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (02) : 805 - 807
  • [49] Nipple-Areola Complex Malposition in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Review of Risk Factors and Corrective Techniques from Greater than 1000 Reconstructions
    Choi, Mihye
    Frey, Jordan D.
    Salibian, Ara A.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (02) : 247E - 257E
  • [50] Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction Using FixNip NRI Implant after Mastectomy: An Innovative Technique
    Iacovelli, Serena
    De Palma, Giuseppe
    De Santis, Valerio
    Cutrignelli, Daniela Anna
    Armenio, Andrea
    Bove, Samantha
    Comes, Maria Colomba
    Fanizzi, Annarita
    Vitale, Elsa
    Massafra, Raffaella
    Ressa, Cosmo Maurizio
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, : 1658 - 1658