The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of penile cancer

被引:70
|
作者
Kayes, Oliver
Minhas, Suks
Allen, Clare
Hare, Chris
Freeman, Alex
Ralph, David
机构
[1] St Peters Hosp, London NW1 2BU, England
[2] Inst Urol, London, England
关键词
MRI; penile cancer; staging;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a local staging technique in penile cancer and its role in selecting patients for conservative surgical management. Methods: Fifty-five men diagnosed with invasive penile carcinoma on biopsy were locally staged with the use of MRI. Prostaglandin El (alprostadil) was injected into the corpora to induce an artificial erection. Radiologic staging was compared against final histopathologic stage of the tumour. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa agreement values were calculated for each tumour stage. Additionally, corpora cavernosa involvement was reviewed in 20 consecutive cases and suitability for conservative surgery assessed. Results: A good correlation between radiologic and histologic staging was achieved with an overall kappa value of 0.75 (p < 0.001). Stagespecific sensitivities and specificities were calculated: T1 (85%; 83%), T2 (75%; 89%), and T3 (88%; 98%). MRI accurately predicted corpora cavernosa invasion in all cases of pathologically proven disease. These patients were selected to undergo partial penectomy. There were no complications using this imaging technique. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that penile MRI is highly accurate in the local staging of penile cancer. Associated improvements in surgical planning allow the provision of conservative surgical treatments over more radical procedures. (c) 2006 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1313 / 1319
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of gastrointestinal neoplasms
    Ferraris, R
    Del Piano, A
    Galli, JJ
    SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 20 (02): : 122 - 129
  • [32] Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of prostate carcinoma
    C. Bartolozzi
    L. Crocetti
    I. Menchi
    S. Ortori
    R. Lencioni
    Abdominal Imaging, 2001, 26 : 111 - 122
  • [33] Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Lesion Detection and Local Staging
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter L.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, VOL 70, 2019, 70 : 451 - 459
  • [34] Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of prostate carcinoma
    Bartolozzi, C
    Crocetti, L
    Menchi, I
    Ortori, S
    Lencioni, R
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2001, 26 (02): : 111 - 122
  • [35] Advancements in staging and imaging for penile cancer
    Ottenhof, Sarah R.
    Leone, Andrew R.
    Horenblas, Simon
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    Vegt, Erik
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (06) : 612 - 620
  • [36] Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging staging of prostate cancer
    Chandra, Ronil V.
    Heinze, Stefan
    Dowling, Richard
    Shadbolt, Clair
    Costello, Anthony
    Pedersen, John
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (10) : 860 - 865
  • [37] Endometrial cancer and preoperative staging by magnetic resonance imaging
    Manfredi, R.
    Giudici, S.
    Piazzola, E.
    Vito, I.
    Merola, A. R.
    Ghezzi, F.
    Cromi, A.
    Franchi, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2007, 17 (04) : 944 - 944
  • [38] Is magnetic resonance imaging necessary in the staging of prostate cancer?
    Tüzel, E
    Sevinç, M
    Obuz, F
    Sade, M
    Kirkali, Z
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1998, 61 (04) : 227 - 231
  • [39] Oral cancer staging established by magnetic resonance imaging
    de Paiva, Rogerio Ribeiro
    de Souza Figueiredo, Paulo Tadeu
    Leite, Andre Ferreira
    Garcia Silva, Maria Alves
    Silva Guerra, Eliete Neves
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 25 (06) : 512 - 518
  • [40] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for Cancer Diagnosis and Staging
    Monticciolo, Debra L.
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2011, 32 (04) : 319 - 330