Empirical evaluation of dissimilarity measures for use in urban structural damage detection

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, ZhiQiang [1 ]
Hutchinson, Tara C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
来源
COMPUTATIONAL IMAGING V | 2007年 / 6498卷
关键词
change detection; dissimilarity measures; urban structural damage; satellite imagery;
D O I
10.1117/12.704553
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multi-temporal earth-observation imagery is now available at sub-meter accuracy and has been found very useful for performing quick damage detection for urban areas affected by large-scale disasters. The detection of structural damage using images taken before and after disaster events is usually modeled as a change detection problem. In this paper, we propose a new perspective for performing change detection, where dissimilarity measures are used to extract urban structural damage. First, image gradient magnitudes and spatial variances are used as a means to capture urban structural features. Subsequently, a family of distribution dissimilarity measures, including: Euclidean distance, Cosine, Jeffery divergence, and Bhattacharyya distance, are used to extract structural damage. We particularly focus on evaluating the performance of these dissimilarity-based change detection methods under the framework of pattern classification and cross-validation, and with the use of a pair of bi-temporal satellite images captured before and after a major earthquake in Barn, Iran. The paper concludes that the proposed change detection methods for urban structural damage detection, which are conceptually simple and computationally efficient, outperform the traditional correlation analysis in terms of both classification accuracy and tolerance to local alignment errors.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Uncertainty Evaluation in the Design of Structural Health Monitoring Systems for Damage Detection
    Kabban, Christine Schubert
    Uber, Richard
    Lin, Kevin
    Lin, Bin
    Bhuiyan, Md Yeasin
    Giurgiutiu, Victor
    [J]. AEROSPACE, 2018, 5 (02)
  • [32] Measures of structural damage for global failure analysis
    Krätzig, WB
    Petryna, YS
    Stangenberg, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2000, 37 (48-50) : 7393 - 7407
  • [33] Urban water use conservation measures
    Kanakoudis, VK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2002, 51 (03): : 153 - 163
  • [34] Comparative Analysis between Singular Spectral Analysis and Empirical Mode Decomposition for Structural Damage Detection
    Gonzalez, Elisa C.
    Salcedo, Gladys E.
    Cano, Leonardo
    [J]. INGENIERIA, 2022, 28 (03):
  • [35] LADAR for structural damage detection
    Moosa, AG
    Fu, GK
    [J]. NONDESTRUCTIVE CHARACTERIZATION OF MATERIALS IX, 1999, 497 : 575 - 580
  • [36] An empirical study of ordinal condom use measures
    Cecil, H
    Pinkerton, SD
    Bogart, LM
    Pavlovic, J
    Kimball, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (04) : 353 - 358
  • [37] Empirical discrepancy measures for the evaluation of segmentation results
    Heimann, T
    Thorn, M
    Kunert, T
    Meinzer, HP
    [J]. CARS 2004: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 1268 : 1276 - 1276
  • [38] Analysis of foot structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis: clinical evaluation by validated measures and serological correlations
    Biscontini, D.
    Bocci, E. Bartoloni
    Gerli, R.
    [J]. REUMATISMO, 2009, 61 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [39] Use of LU Decomposition of Modal Flexibility in Structural Damage Detection: Numerical Validation
    An, Yonghui
    Ou, Jinping
    [J]. DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES X, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 569-570 : 986 - 993
  • [40] The use of fibre Bragg grating sensors for damage detection and location in structural materials
    Thursby, G
    Betz, D
    Staszewski, W
    Culshaw, B
    [J]. SECOND EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL FIBRE SENSORS: PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 5502 : 208 - 212