Modelling the dynamics of the evapotranspiration process using genetic programming

被引:100
|
作者
Parasuraman, Kamban [1 ]
Elshorbagy, Amin
Carey, Sean K.
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, CANSIM, Ctr Adv Numer Simulat, Dept Civil & Geol Engn, Saskatoon, SK 57N 5A9, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
关键词
eddy-covariance; evapotranspiration; modelling; genetic programming; artificial neural networks; Penman-Monteith method;
D O I
10.1623/hysj.52.3.563
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Evapotranspiration constitutes one of the major components of the hydrological cycle and hence its accurate estimation is of vital importance to assess water availability and requirements. This study explores the utility of genetic programming (GP) to model the evapotranspiration process. An important characteristic of GP is that both the model structure and coefficients are simultaneously optimized. The method is applied in modelling eddy-covariance (EC)-measured latent heat (LE) as a function of net radiation (NR), ground temperature (GT), air temperature (AT), wind speed (WS) and relative humidity (RH). Two case studies having different climatic and topographic conditions are considered. The performance of the GP model is compared with artificial neural network (ANN) models and the traditional Penman-Monteith (PM) method. Results from the study indicate that both the data-driven models, GP and ANNs, performed better than the PM method. However, performance of the GP model is comparable with that of the ANN model. The GP-evolved models are dominated by NR and GT, indicating that these two inputs can represent most of the variance in LE. The results show that the GP-evolved equations are parsimonious and understandable, and are well suited to modelling the dynamics of the evapotranspiration process.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 578
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evapotranspiration Modeling Using Linear Genetic Programming Technique
    Kisi, Ozgur
    Guven, Aytac
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2010, 136 (10) : 715 - 723
  • [2] Systems modelling using genetic programming
    Willis, M
    Hiden, H
    Hinchliffe, M
    McKay, B
    Barton, GW
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 21 : S1161 - S1166
  • [3] Systems modelling using genetic programming
    Willis, Mark
    Hiden, Hugo
    Hinchliffe, Mark
    McKay, Ben
    Barton, Geoffrey W.
    [J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 1997, 21 (SUPPL. 1):
  • [4] Steady-state modelling of chemical process systems using genetic programming
    McKay, B
    Willis, M
    Barton, G
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 21 (09) : 981 - 996
  • [5] Steady-state modelling of chemical process systems using genetic programming
    McKay, Ben
    Willis, Mark
    Barton, Geoffrey
    [J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 1997, 21 (09): : 981 - 996
  • [6] MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF THE CO2 LASER CUTTING PROCESS USING GENETIC PROGRAMMING
    Madic, Milos
    Gostimirovic, Marin
    Rodic, Dragan
    Radovanovic, Miroslav
    Coteata, Margareta
    [J]. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 20 (03) : 665 - 676
  • [7] Dynamic chemical process modelling using a multiple basis function genetic programming algorithm
    Hinchliffe, M
    Willis, M
    Tham, M
    [J]. GECCO-99: PROCEEDINGS OF THE GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 1999, : 1782 - 1782
  • [8] Dynamic systems modelling using genetic programming
    Hinchliffe, MP
    Willis, MJ
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 27 (12) : 1841 - 1854
  • [9] Modelling dynamics of genetic networks as a multiscale process
    Wei, XL
    Melnik, RVN
    Moreno-Hagelsieb, G
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2005, PT 3, 2005, 3516 : 134 - 138
  • [10] Rainfall-Runoff Modelling Using Genetic Programming
    Jayawardena, A. W.
    Muttil, N.
    Fernando, T. M. K. G.
    [J]. MODSIM 2005: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2005, : 1841 - 1847