Optimal timing of technology adoption under the changeable abatement coefficient through R&D

被引:8
|
作者
Guo, Jian-Xin [1 ]
Zhu, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Policy & Management, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
关键词
Technology adoption; R&D investment; Learning effect; Switching cost; GAMES; UNCERTAINTY; INNOVATION; EMISSIONS; SYSTEMS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2016.03.025
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Advanced abatement technology adoption has been attached a great importance upon the economic profit especially in the traditional energy intensive industries. In making the adoption decision, a firm has to evaluate the economic profit between the adoption of the advanced technologies and the traditional ones. Moreover, due to the learning-by-searching (LBS) effect, it is preferable to invest upon the installed abatement technology to further increasing the economic profit. Thus, to describe a comprehensive decision strategy, we proposed a hybrid model including output, R&D investment as well as the adoption time to be optimized at the same time. Regarding these as the decision variables, our formulation gives rise to an optimal switching problem for a hybrid system, however, which can hardly be solved analytically. To implement the numerical simulation, we make a transformation in the parameter filed in order to use the control vector parameterization method to solve the original problem. Thus, the proposed optimal control problem can be converted into a non-linear programming problem (NLP), which can be solved conveniently and effectively using the current technique. Based on these facts, we shows that some key economic parameters that inherently define the revenue relationships outside the firm can significantly influence the time of adoption. Furthermore, considering the problem in the multi-technology adoption case, the process can perform in such an unusual way that the firm can leap over some transition technologies to adopt a higher advanced one directly, from which corresponding results are discussed as well. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pollution abatement with disruptive R&D investment*
    Strandholm, John C.
    Espinola-Arredondo, Ana
    Munoz-Garcia, Felix
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 66
  • [22] Endogenous Technology Adoption and R&D as Sources of Business Cycle Persistence
    Anzoategui, Diego
    Comin, Diego
    Gertler, Mark
    Martinez, Joseba
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2019, 11 (03) : 67 - 110
  • [23] The monopolistic polluter under environmental liability law: incentives for abatement and R&D
    Endres, Alfred
    Friehe, Tim
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2013, 40 (03) : 753 - 770
  • [24] The monopolistic polluter under environmental liability law: incentives for abatement and R&D
    Alfred Endres
    Tim Friehe
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2013, 40 : 753 - 770
  • [25] Commercializing public technology through cooperative R&D
    Ciccotello, Conrad S.
    Fu, Richard
    Subramanian, Ajay
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 108 (02) : 113 - 115
  • [26] OPTIMAL TECHNOLOGY SHARING STRATEGIES IN DYNAMIC GAMES OF R&D
    Erkal, Nisvan
    Minehart, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2014, 23 (01) : 149 - 177
  • [27] Technology Trajectories and the Selection of Optimal R&D Project Sequences
    van Bommel, Ties
    Mahieu, Ronald J.
    Nijssen, Edwin J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2014, 61 (04) : 669 - 680
  • [28] Climate change and optimal energy technology R&D policy
    Baker, Erin
    Solak, Senay
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 213 (02) : 442 - 454
  • [29] Strategic timing in R&D agreements
    Marini, Marco A.
    Petit, Maria L.
    Sestini, Roberta
    ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 23 (03) : 274 - 303
  • [30] Energy R&D Investments and Emissions Abatement Policy
    Yin, Di
    Chang, Youngho
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (06): : 133 - 156