Optimal timing of technology adoption under the changeable abatement coefficient through R&D

被引:8
|
作者
Guo, Jian-Xin [1 ]
Zhu, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Policy & Management, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
关键词
Technology adoption; R&D investment; Learning effect; Switching cost; GAMES; UNCERTAINTY; INNOVATION; EMISSIONS; SYSTEMS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2016.03.025
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Advanced abatement technology adoption has been attached a great importance upon the economic profit especially in the traditional energy intensive industries. In making the adoption decision, a firm has to evaluate the economic profit between the adoption of the advanced technologies and the traditional ones. Moreover, due to the learning-by-searching (LBS) effect, it is preferable to invest upon the installed abatement technology to further increasing the economic profit. Thus, to describe a comprehensive decision strategy, we proposed a hybrid model including output, R&D investment as well as the adoption time to be optimized at the same time. Regarding these as the decision variables, our formulation gives rise to an optimal switching problem for a hybrid system, however, which can hardly be solved analytically. To implement the numerical simulation, we make a transformation in the parameter filed in order to use the control vector parameterization method to solve the original problem. Thus, the proposed optimal control problem can be converted into a non-linear programming problem (NLP), which can be solved conveniently and effectively using the current technique. Based on these facts, we shows that some key economic parameters that inherently define the revenue relationships outside the firm can significantly influence the time of adoption. Furthermore, considering the problem in the multi-technology adoption case, the process can perform in such an unusual way that the firm can leap over some transition technologies to adopt a higher advanced one directly, from which corresponding results are discussed as well. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The technology adoption model with R&D
    Wei, YH
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 2316 - 2320
  • [2] Timing and Commitment of Environmental Policy, Adoption of New Technology, and Repercussions on R&D
    Till Requate
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2005, 31 : 175 - 199
  • [3] Timing and commitment of environmental policy, adoption of new technology, and repercussions on R&D
    Requate, T
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2005, 31 (02): : 175 - 199
  • [4] Optimal timing of R&D investment under uncertainty and incomplete information
    Wu Jianzu
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION CHALLENGE AND MANAGEMENT TRANSFORMATION, VOLS I - III, 2007, : 703 - 708
  • [5] Optimal Operation Through R&D
    Agnihotri, Newal
    Modeen, David
    [J]. NUCLEAR PLANT JOURNAL, 2009, 27 (04) : 42 - +
  • [6] ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    Pommeret, Aude
    Schubert, Katheline
    [J]. MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2009, 13 (04) : 493 - 522
  • [7] Optimal timing of technology adoption
    Farzin, YH
    Huisman, KJM
    Kort, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 1998, 22 (05): : 779 - 799
  • [8] International technology adoption, R&D, and productivity growth
    Choi, Seung Mo
    Toro Gonzalez, Daniel
    Gray, Peter
    [J]. B E JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2013, 13 (01): : 331 - 354
  • [9] Optimal Subsidy for Abatement R&D in Different Organizations with Emissions Tax
    Meng, Wei-jun
    He, Bin-yu
    [J]. 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Management System Innovation, 2013, : 173 - 180
  • [10] Regulation, external R&D, and strategic diffusion of pollution abatement technology
    Yan, Yan
    Li, Yi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 86 : 731 - 744