Evaluation of a multiplex gastrointestinal PCR panel for the aetiological diagnosis of infectious diarrhoea

被引:20
|
作者
Leli, Christian [1 ]
Di Matteo, Luigi [1 ]
Gotta, Franca [1 ]
Vay, Dania [2 ]
Cavallo, Valeria [1 ]
Mazzeo, Roberta [1 ]
Busso, Simone [1 ]
Carrabba, Laura [1 ]
Rocchetti, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] SS Antonio & Biagio & C Arrigo Hosp, Microbiol Lab, Via Venezia 16, I-15121 Alessandria, Italy
[2] SS Antonio & Biagio & C Arrigo Hosp, Pathol Unit, Alessandria, Italy
关键词
Gastroenteritis; multiplex polymerase chain reaction; bacteria; virus; biostatistics; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; PATHOGEN PANEL; STOOL; GASTROENTERITIS; CAMPYLOBACTER; MULTICENTER; PREDICTION; NOROVIRUS;
D O I
10.1080/23744235.2019.1688861
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Infectious diarrhoea is a significant cause of morbidity worldwide. Culture and microscopy are time-consuming and have a low yield. New rapid molecular methods such as multiplex PCR, have been recently introduced for aetiological diagnosis. Aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of the FilmArray gastrointestinal panel with that of standard culture for aetiological diagnosis of infectious diarrhoea.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of results of stool samples already processed as part of routine clinical care in the interval from March 2016 to March 2019.Results: One hundred and eighty-three stool samples from as many patients were both cultured and tested by FilmArray and the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between culture and FilmArray with respect to Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica and Shiga-like toxin producing E. coli O157 gave the following results: 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 85-100%) sensitivity; 93.4% (95% CI: 87.9-96.6%) specificity; 74.3% (95% CI: 57.5-86.4%) positive predictive value; 100% (95% CI: 96.7-100%) negative predictive value; 2.9 (95% CI: 1.6-5.1) positive likelihood ratio; zero negative likelihood ratio. By means of FilmArray gastrointestinal (GI) panel, we could identify 34.5% more pathogens (p=.001). Bacteria were mostly detected in patients with 6 or more years of age (chi(2)=17.1; p=.009) during summer.Conclusions: FilmArray GI panel showed a very good diagnostic performance compared to culture for diagnosis of infectious diarrhoea and gave a more detailed picture of the spectrum of the pathogens involved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 120
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HIGH THROUGHPUT MULTIPLEX DNA EXTRACTION PCR IN THE EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH INFECTIOUS DIARRHEA
    Connor, Bradley A.
    Lucak, Susan
    Rogova, Maryna
    Whyte, Olga
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2015, 93 (04): : 389 - 389
  • [32] Multiplex PCR for diagnosis of the most frequent infectious agents in sepsis - where are we now?
    Wellinghausen, N.
    Wirths, B.
    Reischl, U.
    Wassill, L.
    INFECTION, 2005, 33 : 4 - 4
  • [33] Multiplex/realtime PCR in the laboratory diagnosis and for the epidemiological screening of pathogens causing diarrhoea in early childhood in Ghana
    Hagen, R. M.
    Adlkofer, J.
    Acqua, S.
    Sarpong, N.
    Priesnitz, S.
    Adu-Sarkodie, Y.
    Evans, J.
    Huenger, F.
    May, J.
    Tannich, E.
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2009, 14 : 58 - 58
  • [34] Utility of multiplex PCR syndromic panel for respiratory infections in the diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis
    Asencio Egea, Maria Angeles
    Gaitan Pitera, Jorge
    Mendez Gonzalez, Jean Carlos
    Huertas Vaquero, Maria
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2021, 39 (09): : 481 - 482
  • [35] Development of multiplex PCR for neglected infectious diseases
    Sea-liang, Nutchanart
    Sereemaspun, Amornpun
    Patarakul, Kanitha
    Gaywee, Jariyanart
    Rodkvamtook, Wuttikon
    Srisawat, Nattachai
    Wacharaplusadee, Supaporn
    Hemachudha, Thiravat
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2019, 13 (07):
  • [36] Diagnosis and treatment of non-infectious and infectious foal diarrhoea
    Dunkel, Bettina
    PFERDEHEILKUNDE, 2008, 24 (04): : 529 - +
  • [37] Exploring the Utility of Multiplex Infectious Disease Panel Testing for Diagnosis of Infection in Different Body Sites
    Lewinski, Michael A.
    Alby, Kevin
    Babady, N. Esther
    Butler-Wu, Susan M.
    Bard, Jennifer Dien
    Greninger, Alexander L.
    Hanson, Kimberly
    Naccache, Samia N.
    Newton, Duane
    Temple-Smolkin, Robyn L.
    Noltekk, Frederick
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 25 (12): : 857 - 875
  • [38] Infectious foal diarrhoea: pathophysiology, prevalence and diagnosis
    Dunkel, B
    Wilkins, PA
    EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION, 2004, 16 (02) : 94 - 101
  • [39] Clinical evaluation of the single step and multiplex PCR for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis
    Khadapkar, R.
    Fernandes, H.
    Das, B.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2006, 8 (05): : 654 - 654
  • [40] Comment on: Evaluation of a Multiplex Strip PCR Test for Infectious Uveitis: A Prospective Multicenter Study
    Liu, Dan
    Lin, Li-Rong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 221 : 326 - 326