Long-term patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures after injury: the National Trauma Research Action Plan (NTRAP) scoping review

被引:9
|
作者
Herrera-Escobar, Juan P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Osman, Samia Y. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Das, Sophiya [1 ,2 ]
Toppo, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Orlas, Claudia P. [1 ,2 ]
Castillo-Angeles, Manuel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rosario, Angel [1 ,2 ]
Janjua, Mahin B. [5 ]
Arain, Muhammad Abdullah [5 ]
Reidy, Emma [1 ,2 ]
Jarman, Molly P. [1 ,2 ]
Nehra, Deepika [6 ]
Price, Michelle A. [7 ]
Bulger, Eileen M. [6 ]
Haider, Adil H. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Trauma Burn & Surg Crit Care, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Connors Ctr Womens Hlth & Gender Biol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Aga Khan Univ, Med Coll, Off Dean, Karachi, Pakistan
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Coalit Natl Trauma Res, San Antonio, TX USA
来源
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; injury; outcome measures; long-term outcomes; MENTAL-HEALTH; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; MULTIPLE TRAUMA; BRAIN-INJURY; WORK;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000003108
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The aim of this scoping review is to identify and summarize patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that are being used to track long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after injury and can potentially be included in trauma registries. METHODS Online databases were used to identify studies published between 2013 and 2019, from which we selected 747 articles that involved survivors of acute physical traumatic injury aged 18 years or older at time of injury and used PROMs to evaluate recovery between 6 months and 10 years postinjury. Data were extracted and summarized using descriptive statistics and a narrative synthesis of the results. RESULTS Most studies were observational, with relatively small sample sizes, and predominantly on traumatic brain injury or orthopedic patients. The number of PROs assessed per study varied from one to 12, for a total of 2052 PROs extracted, yielding 74 unique constructs (physical health, 25 [34%]; mental health, 27 [37%]; social health, 12 [16%]; cognitive health, 7 [10%]; and quality of life, 3 [4%]). These 74 constructs were assessed using 355 different PROMs. Mental health was the most frequently examined outcome domain followed by physical health. Health-related quality of life, which appeared in more than half of the studies (n = 401), was the most common PRO evaluated, followed by depressive symptoms. Physical health was the domain with the highest number of PROMs used (n = 157), and lower-extremity functionality was the PRO that contributed most PROMs (n = 33). CONCLUSION We identified a wide variety of PROMs available to track long-term PROs after injury in five different health domains: physical, mental, social, cognitive, and quality of life. However, efforts to fully understand the health outcomes of trauma patients remain inconsistent and insufficient. Defining PROs that should be prioritized and standardizing the PROMs to measure them will facilitate the incorporation of long-term outcomes in national registries to improve research and quality of care.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 900
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension
    Conrad, Dean H.
    Pacquee, Stefaan
    Saar, Tal D.
    Walsh, Caroline
    Chou, Danny
    Rosen, David
    Cario, Gregory M.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 (06): : 850 - 855
  • [32] Exploring patient perspectives: orthognathic surgery outcomes and experiences assessed by patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures
    Baniulyte, Gabriele
    Esson, Michael
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 62 (08): : 722 - 728
  • [33] Using patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures to elevate the quality of healthcare
    Casaca, Pedro
    Schafer, Willemijn
    Nunes, Ana Beatriz
    Sousa, Paulo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 35 (04)
  • [34] Patient-reported outcomes in cirrhosis: A scoping review of the literature
    Tapper, Elliot B.
    Kanwal, Fasiha
    Asrani, Sumeet K.
    Ho, Chanda
    Ovchinsky, Nadia
    Poterucha, John
    Flores, Avegail
    Smith, Judith E.
    Ankoma-Sey, Victor
    Luxon, Bruce
    Volk, Michael L.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 67 (06) : 2375 - 2383
  • [35] Patient-reported outcome measures and orthodontics
    Ryan, Fiona S.
    Cunningham, Susan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 45 (02) : 63 - 64
  • [36] Patient-reported outcome measures in depression
    a Steig, David Husdal
    Reinholt, Nina
    Christensen, Anne Bryde
    Hvenegaard Pedersen, Morten
    Arnfred, Sidse Marie
    [J]. NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 77 (02) : 212 - 219
  • [37] Patient-reported outcome measures in urology
    Narang, Gopal L.
    Pannell, Stephanie C.
    Laviana, Aaron A.
    Huen, Kathy H. Y.
    Izard, Jason
    Smith, Angela B.
    Bergman, Jonathan
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 366 - 374
  • [38] Collecting patient-reported outcome measures
    Ahern, Susannah
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Ackerman, Ilana N.
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2017, 47 (12) : 1454 - 1457
  • [39] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR NOCTURIA
    Bower, W.
    Rose, G.
    Denys, M.
    Kumps, C.
    Whishaw, M.
    Khan, F.
    Everaert, K.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2017, 36 : S415 - S416
  • [40] Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric palliative care—a protocol for a scoping review
    Heidi Holmen
    Anette Winger
    Simen A. Steindal
    Charlotte Castor
    Lisbeth Gravdal Kvarme
    Kirsti Riiser
    Kari L. Mariussen
    Anja Lee
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 10