Urban development in post-reform China: State, market, and space

被引:0
|
作者
Friedmann, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 432
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Consequences of birth policies and practices in post-reform China
    Harris, Amanda
    Gao, Yu
    Barclay, Lesley
    Belton, Suzanne
    Yue, Zweng Wei
    Min, Hao
    Auqun, Xu
    Hua, Liao
    Yun, Zhou
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2007, 15 (30) : 114 - 124
  • [42] Knowledge disparity and regional inequality in post-reform China
    Wang, DG
    Zhang, L
    POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2003, 15 (03) : 383 - 399
  • [43] Introduction: The politics of negative affects in post-Reform China
    Richaud, Lisa
    HAU-JOURNAL OF ETHNOGRAPHIC THEORY, 2021, 11 (03) : 901 - 914
  • [45] The challenges of global capitalism: unemployment and state workers' reactions and responses in post-reform China
    Mok, K
    Wong, L
    Lee, GOM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 13 (03): : 399 - 415
  • [46] Economic Performance of Human Capital in Post-Reform China
    Li, Kui-Wai
    Yun, Lihong
    Lui, Gilbert C. S.
    CHINESE ECONOMY, 2009, 42 (01) : 40 - 61
  • [47] Urban Hierarchy of Innovation Capability and Inter-city Linkages of Knowledge in Post-reform China
    LU Lachang1
    2.School of Geographical Science
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, (05) : 602 - 616
  • [48] Twin Movement: State, Market and the Non-Elite Middle Class in Post-Reform India
    Upadhyay, Surya Prakash
    Jha, Isha
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ASIA, 2024, 54 (02) : 282 - 298
  • [49] Urban hierarchy of innovation capability and inter-city linkages of knowledge in post-reform China
    Lu Lachang
    Huang Ru
    CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 22 (05) : 602 - 616
  • [50] Neighborhood governance in post-reform Urban China: Place attachment impact on civic engagement in Guangzhou
    Wu, Rong
    Li, Zhigang
    Liu, Ye
    Huang, Xu
    Liu, Yuqi
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 81 : 472 - 482