Phase II clinical trials in oncology: are we hitting the target?

被引:0
|
作者
Ang, Mei-Kim [1 ]
Tan, Say-Beng [2 ]
Lim, Wan-Teck [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
[2] Singapore Clin Res Inst, Singapore 138669, Singapore
关键词
biomarker; cytostatic agent; end point; enrichment; Phase II study; randomization; targeted therapy; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; RANDOMIZED DISCONTINUATION DESIGN; RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASES; END-POINTS; LUNG-CANCER; SOFT-TISSUE; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; IMATINIB MESYLATE; 2-STAGE DESIGNS;
D O I
10.1586/ERA.09.178
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The number of novel and molecularly targeted agents in the last decade that need screening for preliminary efficacy in Phase II trials has increased. Many of these agents have a cytostatic mode of action that is difficult to assess using traditional Phase II designs. These new agents require detailed evaluation to optimize their dosing, to evaluate their effects on their target and to define early markers that predict for a definitive benefit. This review focuses on the options for Phase II trial designs. The different end points, single versus multiarm and randomized designs, the use of biomarkers and Bayesian approaches are also reviewed. The final design chosen will depend on the characteristics and circumstances of each individual study.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 438
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials
    Chen, Kun
    Shan, Michael
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 29 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [32] Phase II clinical trials in oncology: Strengths and limitations of two-stage designs
    Schlesselman, James J.
    Reis, Isildinha M.
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2006, 24 (04) : 404 - 412
  • [33] An Adaptive Design for Phase II Non-Oncology Dose Selection Clinical Trials
    Su, Zheng
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2010, 30 (06) : 397 - 403
  • [34] Predicting low accrual in the Clinical Trials Cooperative Group Program's phase II/III oncology trials
    Bennette, Caroline Savage
    Ramsey, Scott David
    McDermott, Cara L.
    Carlson, Josh John
    Basu, Anirban
    Veenstra, David L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [35] Phase II oncology trials: Let's be positive
    Ratain, MJ
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (16) : 5661 - 5662
  • [36] Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology
    Ivanova, A
    Qaqish, BF
    Schell, MJ
    BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (02) : 540 - 545
  • [37] The Role of Biofilms: Are We Hitting the Right Target?
    Wolcott, Randall
    Dowd, Scot
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (01) : 28S - 35S
  • [38] The importance of phase I/II trials in pediatric oncology
    MacArthur, CA
    Vietti, T
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 1996, 14 (01) : 33 - 35
  • [39] Cancer Centers Hitting the Target: We Are Precise, But Are We Accurate?
    Zuckerman, Dan S.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2019, 15 (06) : 305 - +
  • [40] Critical appraisal of clinical trials in oncology - part II
    Potemski, Piotr
    Polowinczak-Przybylek, Joanna
    Wojcik, Rafal
    Kaczor, Marcin
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 15 (03): : 158 - 166