What is the optimum maximal gonadotropin dosage used in microdose flare-up cycles in poor responders?

被引:74
|
作者
Berkkanoglu, Murat [1 ]
Ozgur, Kemal [1 ]
机构
[1] Antalya IVF Ctr, Antalya, Turkey
关键词
Recombinant FSH; microdose cycle; pregnancy rate; poor responders; FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; OVULATION INDUCTION; OVARIAN STIMULATION; IVF; FSH; PROTOCOL; AGONIST; PHASE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To find out the optimum maximal dosage of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRH-a) flare cycles in poor responders. Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Private infertility clinic. Patient(s): A total of 119 women were taken into the study. Intervention(s): The study group underwent a microdose protocol with a GnRH-agonist followed by rFSH administration. On the third day of GnRH-a administration, 119 patients were randomized in three groups to receive daily fixed doses of 300 IU of rFSH(group A, n = 38), or 450 IU of rFSH(group B, n = 39), or 600 IU of rFSH (group C, n = 42). Main Outcome Measure(s): Peak E-2 levels, days of stimulation with rFSH, total rFSH dosage, total number of oocytes retrieved, M2 oocytes retrieved, total number of embryos, number of embryos transferred, number of Grade-1 embryos transferred, clinical pregnancy rate (positive fetal cardiac activity), and cancellation rates of stimulation and embryo transfer. Result(s): Clinical pregnancy rates were 13.1%, 15.3%, and 16.1% for group A, group B, and group C, respectively. There were no significant differences in the age, peak serum E-2 concentration, days of stimulation with rFSH, total number of M2 oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred, clinical pregnancy rates, and cancellation rates of stimulation and embryo transfer between the three groups except for total rFSH dosage. Conclusion(s): There is no need to use doses above 300 IU of rFSH to increase the pregnancy rate in microdose cycles. In addition, because the duration of stimulation does not differ between the groups, the usage of 300 IU rFSH in microdose cycles results in less total amount of rFSH consumed in a cycle compared with higher dosages, and this would obviously cost less money to the patients. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010;94:662-5. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 665
页数:4
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] What is the optimum maximal gonadotropin dosage used in microdose flare-up cycles in poor responders?
    Berkkanoglu, M.
    Agar, M.
    Ozgur, K.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S281 - S281
  • [2] Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    Ghaffari, Firouzeh
    Jahangiri, Nadia
    Madani, Tahereh
    Khodabakhshi, Shabnam
    Chehrazi, Mohammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 148 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [3] COMPARISON OF THE ULTRASHORT GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST-ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL WITH MICRODOSE FLARE-UP PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY.
    Berker, B.
    Duvan, C. Iltemir
    Kaya, C.
    Aytac, R.
    Satiroglu, H.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S243 - S243
  • [4] Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
    Eftekhar, Maryam
    Mohammadian, Farnaz
    Yousefnejad, Fariba
    Khani, Parisa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2013, 6 (04) : 266 - 271
  • [5] Antagonist/letrozole protocol in poor ovarian responders for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a comparative study with the microdose flare-up protocol
    Yarali, Hakan
    Esinler, Ibrahim
    Polat, Mehtap
    Bozdag, Gurkan
    Tiras, Bulent
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (01) : 231 - 235
  • [6] Comparison of the ultrashort gonadotropinreleasing hormone agonist-antagonist protocol with microdose flare-up protocol in poor responders: a preliminary study
    Berker, Bulent
    Duvan, Candan Iltemir
    Kaya, Cemil
    Aytac, Rusen
    Satiroglu, Hakan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 11 (04) : 187 - 193
  • [7] Comparison of estradiol and progesterone priming/antagonist/letrozole and microdose flare-up protocols for poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    Yucel, Oguz
    Ekin, Murat
    Cengiz, Huseyin
    Zebitay, Ali Galip
    Yalcinkaya, Sener
    Karahuseyinoglu, Sercin
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (09) : 653 - 656
  • [8] Natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue flare cycles in poor responders who undergo in vitro fertilization
    Schimberni, M
    Giallonardo, A
    Piscitelli, C
    Giannini, P
    Morgia, F
    Sbracia, M
    Aragona, C
    [J]. Human Reproduction, 2005, : 617 - 622
  • [9] MICRODOSE GnRH AGONIST FLARE-UP VERSUS FLEXIBLE GnRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS UNDERGOING IN-VITRO-FERTILIZATION (IVF) CYCLES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
    Malhotra, N.
    Singh, N.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S106 - S106
  • [10] A randomized prospective study of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus agonist microdose flare-up protocol in poor responder patients
    Ozdogan, S.
    Ozdegirmenci, O.
    Dilbaz, S.
    Demir, B.
    Cinar, O.
    Dilbaz, B.
    Goktolga, U.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27