Antagonist/letrozole protocol in poor ovarian responders for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a comparative study with the microdose flare-up protocol

被引:66
|
作者
Yarali, Hakan [1 ,2 ]
Esinler, Ibrahim [1 ]
Polat, Mehtap [2 ]
Bozdag, Gurkan [1 ]
Tiras, Bulent [2 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-6700 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Anatolia Women & IVF Hlth Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Letrozole; microdose flare-up; ovarian reserve; assisted reproductive technologies; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; pregnancy; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; INVITRO FERTILIZATION; PRIMATE OVARY; LETROZOLE; GONADOTROPINS; STIMULATION; ANDROGENS; AROMATASE; WOMEN; IVF;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.057
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the effect of the GnRH antagonist/letrozole protocol (AL) with the microdose GnRH agonist flare-up (MF) protocol in poor ovarian responders for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Design: Retrospective, case-control study. Setting: Anatolia Women and IVF Center. Patient(S): Eight hundred eighty-five consecutive patients (1383 cycles) predicted to have or with a history of poor ovarian response who were undergoing ICSI were enrolled. The MF protocol was used in 673 patients (1026 cycles), and the AL protocol was used in the remaining 212 patients (357 cycles). Intervention(s): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and ICSI. Main Outcome Measurement(s): Cycle cancellation rate, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates. Result(S): The total gonadotropin consumption, duration of stimulation, E(2) level on the day of hCG administration, and number of oocytes retrieved were significantly lower with the AL protocol compared with the MF protocol. However, the fertilization rate and the rate of at least one top-quality embryo transferred were higher with the AL compared with the MF protocol. The clinical pregnancy rates were comparable between the two groups. The implantation rates with the MF and AL protocols were 9.8% and 14.5%, respectively. Conclusion(s): The GnRH AL protocol is an effective protocol that may be used in poor ovarian responders for ICSI. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;92:231-5. (C) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 235
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of estradiol and progesterone priming/antagonist/letrozole and microdose flare-up protocols for poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    Yucel, Oguz
    Ekin, Murat
    Cengiz, Huseyin
    Zebitay, Ali Galip
    Yalcinkaya, Sener
    Karahuseyinoglu, Sercin
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (09) : 653 - 656
  • [2] Comparison of the ultrashort gonadotropinreleasing hormone agonist-antagonist protocol with microdose flare-up protocol in poor responders: a preliminary study
    Berker, Bulent
    Duvan, Candan Iltemir
    Kaya, Cemil
    Aytac, Rusen
    Satiroglu, Hakan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 11 (04) : 187 - 193
  • [3] COMPARISON OF THE ULTRASHORT GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST-ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL WITH MICRODOSE FLARE-UP PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY.
    Berker, B.
    Duvan, C. Iltemir
    Kaya, C.
    Aytac, R.
    Satiroglu, H.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S243 - S243
  • [4] Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    Ghaffari, Firouzeh
    Jahangiri, Nadia
    Madani, Tahereh
    Khodabakhshi, Shabnam
    Chehrazi, Mohammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 148 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [5] Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle
    Kahraman, Korhan
    Berker, Bulent
    Atabekoglu, Cem Somer
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Cetinkaya, Esra
    Aytac, Rusen
    Satiroglu, Hakan
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (06) : 2437 - 2444
  • [6] Comparison of GnRH-Agonist Microdose Flare-up Protocol and Flexible Multiple Dose Antagonistic Protocol in Poor Responder Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycle
    Uludag, Semih
    Kutuk, Mehmet Serdar
    Dolanbay, Mehmet
    Altun, Ozguc
    Ozgun, Mahmut Tuncay
    Aygen, Ercan
    Sahin, Yilmaz
    [J]. ERCIYES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 35 (02) : 52 - 55
  • [7] GNRH ANTAGONIST/LETROZOLE VERSUS MICRODOSE GNRH AGONIST FLARE PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS UNDERGOING IN VITRO FERTILIZATION
    Davar, Robab
    Oskouian, Homa
    Ahmadi, Shahnaz
    Firouzabadi, Razieh Dehghani
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 49 (03): : 297 - 301
  • [8] A Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist versus a Microdose Flare-Up GnRH Agonist Combined with a Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders to IVF
    Celik, Gayem Inayet Turgay
    Sutcu, Havva Komur
    Akpak, Yasam Kemal
    Akar, Munire Erman
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [9] A comparison of microdose flare protocol versus AACEP protocol for IVF poor responders
    Quintero, R.
    Yap, R.
    Lopez, M.
    Acacio, B.
    Nouriani, M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 : S25 - S25
  • [10] Effectiveness of the antagonist/letrozole protocol for treating poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Yu
    Li, Zhiling
    Wu, Xiaoyan
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    Xiao, Jianfeng
    Wang, Bin
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (05) : 330 - 334