Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle

被引:56
|
作者
Kahraman, Korhan [1 ]
Berker, Bulent [2 ]
Atabekoglu, Cem Somer [2 ]
Sonmezer, Murat [2 ]
Cetinkaya, Esra [1 ]
Aytac, Rusen [2 ]
Satiroglu, Hakan [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Sch Med, Div Reprod Med & Gynecol Endocrinol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; flare-up protocol; GnRH agonist; GnRH antagonist; poor responder; recombinant FSH; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE; CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION; RECOMBINANT LUTEINIZING-HORMONE; GNRH ANTAGONIST; OVULATION INDUCTION; IVF; LEUPROLIDE; GANIRELIX; RESERVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy of microdose GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) flare-up and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocols in patients who have a poor response to a long luteal GnRH-a protocol. Design: Prospective, randomized, clinical study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Forty-two poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-embryo transfer cycle. Intervention(s): Twenty-one patients received microdose leuprolide acetate (LA) (50 mu g twice daily) starting on the second day of withdrawal bleeding. The other 21 patients received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix daily when the leading follicle reached 14 mm in diameter. Main Outcome Measure(s): Serum E-2 levels, number of growing follicles and mature oocytes, embryo quality, dose of gonadotropin used, cancellation, fertilization, implantation rate and pregnancy rate (PR). Result(s): The mean serum E-2 concentration on the day of hCG administration was significantly higher in the microdose GnRH-a group than in the GnRH antagonist group (1,904 vs. 1,362 pg/mL). The clinical PRs per started cycle of microdose GnRH-a and GnRH antagonist groups were 14.2% and 9.5%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the other ovulation induction characteristics, fertilization and implantation rates. Conclusion(s): Microdose GnRH-a flare-up protocol and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol seem to have similar efficacy in improving treatment outcomes of poor responder patients. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;91:2437-44. (C) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:2437 / 2444
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    Ghaffari, Firouzeh
    Jahangiri, Nadia
    Madani, Tahereh
    Khodabakhshi, Shabnam
    Chehrazi, Mohammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 148 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [2] COMPARISON OF THE ULTRASHORT GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST-ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL WITH MICRODOSE FLARE-UP PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY.
    Berker, B.
    Duvan, C. Iltemir
    Kaya, C.
    Aytac, R.
    Satiroglu, H.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S243 - S243
  • [3] A randomized prospective study of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus agonist microdose flare-up protocol in poor responder patients
    Ozdogan, S.
    Ozdegirmenci, O.
    Dilbaz, S.
    Demir, B.
    Cinar, O.
    Dilbaz, B.
    Goktolga, U.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [4] Contraceptive pill and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) flare-up agonist versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: Lessons to a prospective study
    Scheffler, F.
    Merviel, P.
    Lourdel, E.
    Cabry, R.
    Devaux, A.
    Benkhalifa, M.
    Mansouri, N.
    Celton, N.
    Copin, H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 295 - 295
  • [5] Ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with flexible multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for poor responders in in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programs
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Kruchkovich, Jenny
    Rabinson, Jacob
    Zohav, Efraim
    Anteby, Eyal Y.
    Meltcer, Simion
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 (01) : 228 - 230
  • [6] Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes
    Weitzman, Vanessa N.
    Engmann, Lawrence
    DiLuigi, Andrea
    Maier, Donald
    Nulsen, John
    Benadiva, Claudio
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (01) : 226 - 230
  • [7] Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation
    Malmusi, S
    La Marca, A
    Giulini, S
    Xella, S
    Tagliasacchi, D
    Marsella, T
    Volpe, A
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (02) : 402 - 406
  • [8] Microdose Flare-Up Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Versus GnRH Antagonist Protocols for Poor Responder Patients: A Meta-Analysis
    De Pinho, Joao
    Gibbons, Willam
    Kovanci, Ertug
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 18 (03) : 115A - 115A
  • [9] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a novel method of ovarian stimulation in poor responders
    Nikolettos, N
    Al-Hasani, S
    Felberbaum, R
    Demirel, LC
    Kupker, W
    Montzka, P
    Xia, YX
    Schopper, B
    Sturm, R
    Diedrich, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02): : 202 - 207
  • [10] Sperm to zona pellucida binding depends on the use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist
    Schröder, AK
    Schöpper, B
    Al-Hasani, S
    Löning, M
    Diedrich, K
    Ludwig, M
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (03) : 648 - 650