Enriched methane production by solar steam reformer: process evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
De Falco, M. [1 ,2 ]
Marrelli, L. [1 ]
Giaconia, A. [3 ]
Tarquini, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[2] Log Energet Srl, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[3] ENEA Res Ctr Casaccia, I-00123 Rome, Italy
关键词
enriched methane; hydrogen; solar energy; clean electricity production; NATURAL-GAS; HYDROGEN ADDITION; FUELED VEHICLES; PERFORMANCE; STORAGE; ENERGY; PLANTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The aim of this work is to present a novel hybrid plant for the production of a mixture of methane and hydrogen from a steam reforming reactor whose heat duty is supplied by a molten sail stream heated up by the innovative concentrating solar power plant developed by ENEA. By this way, a hydrogen stream, mixed with natural gas, is produced from solar energy by a consolidated production method as the steam reforming process and by a widely tested and pre-commercial technology as molten salts parabolic mirrors solar plant. After the hydrogen production plant, the residual heat stored in the molten salt stream is used to produce electricity. A module of the plant requires 1.5 hectares and can supply electricity and gas to 3000 domestic Italian users. A 4-tubes-and-shell reactor 0.5 m long and with packed bed tubular reactor with diameter of 3 '' is able to produce up to 350 Nm(3)/h of enriched methane.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Production of Hydrogen by Steam Methane Reformation Process
    Younus, T.
    Anwer, A.
    Asim, Z.
    Surahio, M. S.
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES ON CLEAN ENERGY RESEARCH (ICACER 2018), 2018, 51
  • [22] Thermodynamic comparison of two processes of hydrogen production: - Steam methane reforming process - A solar thermochemical process
    Engineering Faculty, Department of Génie Climatique, Campus Ahmed Hammani , 25000 Constantine, Algeria
    International Journal of Heat and Technology, 2007, 25 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [23] Selecting the right steam methane reformer: Can vs. box design Simulating various configurations and cost estimates aids in the selection of a steam methane reformer for hydrogen production
    Schoerner, W.
    Shahani, G.
    Musich, N.
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2011, 90 (12): : 41 - 42
  • [24] Chemical Process Simulation for Dynamic Risk Analysis: A Steam Methane Reformer Case Study
    Moskowitz, Ian H.
    Seider, Warren D.
    Soroush, Masoud
    Oktem, Ulku G.
    Arbogast, Jeffrey E.
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2015, 54 (16) : 4347 - 4359
  • [25] Numerical parametric study on the burner arrangement design for hydrogen production in a steam methane reformer
    Rohini, Ajith Krishnan
    Choi, Seok Hyun
    Lee, Hee Joon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 45 (11) : 16006 - 16026
  • [26] Development of a stand-alone steam methane reformer for on-site hydrogen production
    Yang, Jung-Il
    Kim, Tae Wan
    Park, Ji Chan
    Lim, Tak-Hyoung
    Jung, Heon
    Chun, Dong Hyun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (19) : 8176 - 8183
  • [27] Numerical Study on Operating Parameters and Shapes of a Steam Reformer for Hydrogen Production from Methane
    Park, Joonguen
    Lee, Shinku
    Lim, Sungkwang
    Bae, Joongmyeon
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS B, 2009, 33 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [28] Effect of ceria morphology on hydrogen production via methane steam reforming for membrane reformer
    Baudh, Anjali
    Garjola, Meenakshi
    Sharma, Rahul
    Sharma, Sweta
    Upadhyay, Rajesh Kumar
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 102 (11): : 3803 - 3816
  • [29] Effect of inert metal foam matrices on hydrogen production intensification of methane steam reforming process in wall-coated reformer
    Settar, Abdelhakim
    Abboudi, Said
    Lebaal, Nadhir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (27) : 12386 - 12397
  • [30] Modeling and control of a protonic membrane steam methane reformer
    Cui, Xiaodong
    Peters, Dominic
    Wang, Yifei
    Çıtmacı, Berkay
    Richard, Derek
    Morales-Guio, Carlos G.
    Christofides, Panagiotis D.
    Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2024, 212 : 493 - 519