共 50 条
Efficacy of systemic lidocaine on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
被引:14
|作者:
Yao, Yusheng
[1
]
Jiang, Jundan
[1
]
Lin, Wenjun
[1
]
Yu, Yazhen
[1
]
Guo, Yanhua
[1
]
Zheng, Xiaochun
[1
]
机构:
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Shengli Clin Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, 134 Dongjie, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词:
Quality of recovery;
Lidocaine;
Video-assisted thoracic surgery;
Pain management;
PERIOPERATIVE INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY;
CHRONIC PAIN;
METAANALYSIS;
INFUSION;
FAILS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110223
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
Study objective: Intraoperative systemic lidocaine has become widely accepted as an adjunct to general anesthesia, associated with opioid-sparing and enhanced recovery. We hypothesized that perioperative systemic lidocaine improves postoperative pain and enhances the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients following videoassisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Design: Prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Setting: Single institution, tertiary university hospital. Patients: Adult patients aged 18 to 65 undergoing VATS were eligible for participation. Interventions: Patients enrolled in this study were randomized to receive either system lidocaine (a bolus of 1.5 mg kg-1, followed by an infusion of 2 mg kg-1 h-1 until the end of the surgical procedure) or identical volumes and rates of 0.9% saline. Measurements: The primary outcome was a global QoR-15 score 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain score, cumulative opioid consumption, emergence time, length of PACU stay, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Main results: There was no difference in the global QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively between the lidocaine and saline groups (median 117, IQR 113.5-124, vs. median 116, IQR 111-120, P = 0.067), with a median difference of 3 (95% CI 0 to 6, P = 0.507). Similarly, postoperative pain scores, postoperative cumulative opioid consumption, PACU length of stay, the occurrence of PONV, and patient satisfaction were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our current findings do not support using perioperative systemic lidocaine as a potential strategy to improve postoperative pain and enhance QoR in patients undergoing VATS. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR1900027515).
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文