Bootstrap inference for instrumental variable models with many weak instruments

被引:9
|
作者
Wang, Wenjie [1 ]
Kaffo, Maximilien [2 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Social Sci, 1-2-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima 7398525, Japan
[2] Int Monetary Fund, 700 19th St NW, Washington, DC 20431 USA
关键词
Bootstrap; Many instruments; Weak instruments; LIML; FULL; Corrected standard error; P-REGRESSION PARAMETERS; ASYMPTOTIC-BEHAVIOR; GENERALIZED-METHOD; CLASS ESTIMATORS; WILD BOOTSTRAP; DISTRIBUTIONS; EQUATION; MOMENTS; NUMBER; APPROXIMATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.12.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study's main contribution is to theoretically analyze the application of bootstrap methods to instrumental variable models when the available instruments may be weak and the number of instruments goes to infinity with the sample size. We demonstrate that a standard residual-based bootstrap procedure cannot consistently estimate the distribution of the limited information maximum likelihood estimator or Fuller (1977) estimator under many/many weak instrument sequence. The primary reason is that the standard procedure fails to capture the instrument strength in the sample adequately. In addition, we consider the restricted efficient (RE) bootstrap of Davidson and MacKinnon (2008, 2010, 2014) that generates bootstrap data under the null (restricted) and uses an efficient estimator of the coefficient of the reduced-form equation (efficient). We find that the RE bootstrap is also invalid; however, it effectively mimics more key features in the limiting distributions of interest, and thus, is less distorted in finite samples than the standard bootstrap procedure. Finally, we propose modified bootstrap procedures that provide a valid distributional approximation for the two estimators with many/many weak instruments. A Monte Carlo experiment shows that hypothesis testing based on the asymptotic normal approximation can have severe size distortions in finite samples. Instead, our modified bootstrap procedures greatly reduce these distortions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 268
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INFERENCE IN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE MODELS WITH HETEROSKEDASTICITY AND MANY INSTRUMENTS
    Crudu, Federico
    Mellace, Giovanni
    Sandor, Zsolt
    [J]. ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2021, 37 (02) : 281 - 310
  • [2] On the instrumental variable estimation with many weak and invalid instruments
    Lin, Yiqi
    Windmeijer, Frank
    Song, Xinyuan
    Fan, Qingliang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2024, 86 (04) : 1068 - 1088
  • [3] Semiparametric Bayes instrumental variable estimation with many weak instruments
    Kato, Ryo
    Hoshino, Takahiro
    [J]. STAT, 2021, 10 (01):
  • [4] Inference with Many Weak Instruments
    Mikusheva, Anna
    Sun, Liyang
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2022, 89 (05): : 2663 - 2686
  • [5] Cross-sectional averaging and instrumental variable estimation with many weak instruments
    Kapetanios, George
    Marcellino, Massimiliano
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 108 (01) : 36 - 39
  • [6] Instrumental variable estimation with heteroskedasticity and many instruments
    Hausman, Jerry A.
    Newey, Whitney K.
    Woutersen, Tiemen
    Chao, John C.
    Swanson, Norman R.
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2012, 3 (02) : 211 - 255
  • [7] On bootstrap validity for specification testing with many weak instruments
    Kaffo, Maximilien
    Wang, Wenjie
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 157 : 107 - 111
  • [8] Wild bootstrap inference for instrumental variables regressions with weak and few clusters
    Wang, Wenjie
    Zhang, Yichong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2024, 241 (01)
  • [9] Inference on structural parameters in instrumental variables regression with weak instruments
    Wang, JH
    Zivot, E
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1998, 66 (06) : 1389 - 1404
  • [10] Instrumental variables estimation with many weak instruments using regularized JIVE
    Hansen, Christian
    Kozbur, Damian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2014, 182 (02) : 290 - 308