Personal protective equipment use by healthcare workers in intensive care unit during the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a secondary analysis of the PPE-SAFE survey

被引:23
|
作者
Ippolito, Mariachiara [2 ]
Ramanan, Mahesh [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bellina, Davide [2 ]
Catalisano, Giulia [2 ]
Iozzo, Pasquale [6 ]
Di Guardo, Andrea [2 ]
Moscarelli, Alessandra [2 ]
Grasselli, Giacomo [7 ]
Giarratano, Antonino [1 ,2 ]
Bassetti, Matteo [8 ]
Tabah, Alexis [9 ]
Cortegiani, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Policlin Paolo Giaccone, Dept Anaesthesia Intens Care & Emergency, Via Vespro 129, I-90127 Palermo, Italy
[2] Univ Palermo, Dept Surg Oncol & Oral Sci Di Chir OnS, Palermo, Sicilia, Italy
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Caboolture Hosp, Intens Care Units, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Prince Charles Hosp, Intens Care Units, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ New South Wales, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Palermo, Policlin Paolo Giaccone, Dept Anaesthesia Intens Care & Emergency, Palermo, Sicilia, Italy
[7] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Dipartimento Anestesia Rianimaz & Emergenza Urgen, Milan, Italy
[8] Univ Genoa, San Martino IST Univ Hosp, Infect Dis Clin, Genoa, Liguria, Italy
[9] Univ Queensland, Redcliffe Hosp, Fac Med, Intens Care Unit, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
关键词
COVID-19; Italy; personal protective equipment; PPE-SAFE; survey;
D O I
10.1177/2049936121998562
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Italy was the first Western country to be heavily affected by COVID-19. Healthcare workers (HCWs) were exposed to a high risk of occupational infection, partially due to insufficient personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. This study aimed to describe the practices, availability, training, confidence in PPE use and the adverse effects due to extended PPE use, as reported by HCWs in Italy. We also aimed to provide a comparison between Italian data and those from other countries. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of a previously published international study, the PPE-SAFE Survey, conducted in April 2020. Data were analysed from the original study database. Results: We analysed the responses from 380 healthcare workers based in Italy, out of the 2711 respondents to the international survey. Among the Italian respondents, FFP2 and FFP3 respirators or equivalent were the most used masks for routine tasks (respectively 188/380, 50%; and 163/380, 43%). The median time of wearing PPE without taking a break was 5 h [interquartile range (IQR) 4-6], with statistically significant difference from other countries [median 4 h (IQR 2-5) p < 0.0001]. In Italy, 249 out of 380 (65%) HCWs had never performed a formal fit test for a N95 mask or equivalent and 91/380 (24%) never had a partner for donning and doffing procedures. Most of the respondents (299/380, 79%) had received formal training in PPE use at any time. Conclusion: Most of the surveyed Italian HCWs reported working at above usual capacity, long shifts with PPE without breaks and routine use in intensive care unit of aerosol protection (e.g. FFP2/FFP3), hazmat suits and face shields/visors. The correct adherence to safety procedures (e.g. donning/doffing in pairs, performing fit test) has substantial scope for improvement in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safe delivery of emergency laparotomy using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic
    O'Connor, Adam
    Bennett, Jayne
    Alam, Imran
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [22] Healthcare workers safety in the COVID-19 era: the impact of pre-pandemic personal protective equipment (PPE) training in Pakistan
    Haq, Zia Ul
    Sher, Zarghona Fazal
    Khattak, Farhad Ali
    Hakim, Muhammad
    Ullah, Naeem
    Rahim, Abid
    Hussain, Umar
    Afaq, Saima
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [23] Healthcare workers safety in the COVID-19 era: the impact of pre-pandemic personal protective equipment (PPE) training in Pakistan
    Zia Ul Haq
    Zarghona Fazal Sher
    Farhad Ali Khattak
    Muhammad Zala
    Naeem Hakim
    Abid Ullah
    Umar Rahim
    Saima Hussain
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [24] FACIAL ECZEMA IN HEALTHCARE WORKERS USING PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC - A SURVEY AT SIX DANISH HOSPITALS
    Skiveren, Jette
    Ryborg, Malene F.
    Nilausen, Britt
    Bermark, Susan
    Philipsen, Peter
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2022, 102 : 26 - 26
  • [25] Headaches and the use of protective personal equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Oliveira, R.
    Gil Gouveia, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 28 : 700 - 700
  • [26] Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Schoberer, Daniela
    Osmancevic, Selvedina
    Reiter, Lea
    Thonhofer, Nina
    Hoedl, Manuela
    PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE, 2022, 4
  • [27] Personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic for oculofacial plastic and orbital surgery
    Daigle, Patrick
    Leung, Victoria
    Yin, Vivian
    Kalin-Hajdu, Evan
    Nijhawan, Navdeep
    ORBIT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS-OCULOPLASTIC AND LACRIMAL SURGERY, 2021, 40 (04): : 281 - 286
  • [28] Headache associated with the use of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international survey
    Marfil-Rivera, Alejandro
    Marfil-Garza, Braulio A.
    Fernandez-Garza, Luis E.
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2021, 73 (05) : 151 - 164
  • [29] A survey of personal protective equipment use among US otolaryngologists during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Yu, Karina
    Micco, Alan G.
    Ference, Elisabeth
    Levy, Joshua M.
    Smith, Stephanie Shintani
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06)
  • [30] Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in COVID 19 Pandemic Related Symptoms and Adverse Reactions in Healthcare Workers and General Population
    Battista, Rosa Alessia
    Ferraro, Milena
    Piccioni, Lucia Oriella
    Malzanni, Giulia Elvira
    Bussi, Mario
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2021, 63 (02) : E80 - E85