Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber's law

被引:20
|
作者
Ganel, Tzvi [1 ]
Namdar, Gal [1 ]
Mirsky, Avigail [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Psychol, IL-8410500 Beer Sheva, Israel
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2017年 / 7卷
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
PERCEPTION; TIME; VIOLATE; VISION; TASK; CUES;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-06799-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
According to Weber's law, a fundamental principle of perception, visual resolution decreases in a linear fashion with an increase in object size. Previous studies have shown, however, that unlike for perception, grasping does not adhere to Weber's law. Yet, this research was limited by the fact that perception and grasping were examined for a restricted range of stimulus sizes bounded by the maximum fingers span. The purpose of the current study was to test the generality of the dissociation between perception and action across a different type of visuomotor task, that of bimanual grasping. Bimanual grasping also allows to effectively measure visual resolution during perception and action across a wide range of stimulus sizes compared to unimanual grasps. Participants grasped or estimated the sizes of large objects using both their hands. The results showed that bimanual grasps violated Weber's law throughout the entire movement trajectory. In contrast, Just Noticeable Differences (JNDs) for perceptual estimations of the objects increased linearly with size, in agreement with Weber's law. The findings suggest that visuomotor control, across different types of actions and for a large range of size, is based on absolute rather than on relative representation of object size.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Weber’s law in 2D and 3D grasping
    Aviad Ozana
    Tzvi Ganel
    Psychological Research, 2019, 83 : 977 - 988
  • [22] Biomechanical factors may explain why grasping violates Weber's law
    Utz, Kathrin S.
    Hesse, Constanze
    Aschenneller, Nina
    Schenk, Thomas
    VISION RESEARCH, 2015, 111 : 22 - 30
  • [23] Action is immune to the effects of Weber's law throughout the entire grasping trajectory
    Ganel, Tzvi
    Freud, Erez
    Meiran, Nachshon
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2014, 14 (07): : 1 - 11
  • [24] Not only perception but also grasping actions can obey Weber's law
    Derzsi, Zoltan
    Volcic, Robert
    COGNITION, 2023, 237
  • [25] Does the reaction to adrenalin obey Weber's law?
    Lyon, DM
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 1923, 21 (04): : 229 - 235
  • [26] Do estimates of numerosity really adhere to Weber's law? A reexamination of two case studies
    Testolin, Alberto
    McClelland, James L.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2021, 28 (01) : 158 - 168
  • [27] Do estimates of numerosity really adhere to Weber’s law? A reexamination of two case studies
    Alberto Testolin
    James L. McClelland
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2021, 28 : 158 - 168
  • [28] Obeying the law: speed–precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber’s law in 2D grasping
    Aviad Ozana
    Tzvi Ganel
    Experimental Brain Research, 2019, 237 : 2011 - 2021
  • [29] Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND
    Bhatia, Kriti
    Loewenkamp, Christian
    Franz, Volker H.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2022, 22 (12):
  • [30] Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping
    Ozana, Aviad
    Ganel, Tzvi
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 237 (08) : 2011 - 2021