The impact of inter-fraction dose variations on biological equivalent dose (BED): the concept of equivalent constant dose

被引:8
|
作者
Zavgorodni, S [1 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Med Phys, Vancouver Island Ctr, Victoria, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Victoria, Dept Phys & Astron, Victoria, BC, Canada
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2004年 / 49卷 / 23期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/49/23/010
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Inter-fraction dose fluctuations, which appear as a result of setup errors. organ motion and treatment machine output variations. may influence the radiobiological effect of the treatment even when the total delivered physical dose remains constant. The effect of these inter-fraction dose fluctuations on the biological effective dose (BED) has been investigated. Analytical expressions for the BED accounting for the dose fluctuations have, been derived. The concept of biological effective constant dose (BECD) has been introduced. The equivalent constant dose (ECD), representing the constant physical dose that provides the same cell survival fraction as the fluctuating! dose, has also been introduced. The dose fluctuations with Gaussian as well as exponential probability density functions were investigated. The values of BECD and ECD calculated analytically were compared with those derived from Monte Carlo modelling. The agreement between Monte Carlo modelled and analytical values was excellent (within 1%) for a range of dose standard deviations (0-100% of the dose) and the number of fractions (2 to 37) used in the comparison. The ECDs have also been calculated for conventional radiotherapy fields. The analytical expression for the BECD shows that BECD increases linearly with the variance of the dose. The effect is relatively small, and in the flat regions of the field it results in less than 1% increase of ECD. In the penumbra region of the 6 MV single radiotherapy beam the ECD exceeded the physical dose by up to 35%. when the-standard deviation of combined patient setup/organ motion uncertainty was 5 mm. Equivalently, the ECD field was similar to2 mm wider than the physical dose field. The difference between ECD and the physical dose is greater for normal tissues than for tumours.
引用
收藏
页码:5333 / 5345
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dose gradient impact on biological equivalent dose for accelerated partial breast irradiation using high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy
    Ferre, M.
    Courdi, A.
    Hannoun, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S526 - S526
  • [22] DOSE EQUIVALENT UNIT
    HARDER, D
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1979, 37 (02): : 249 - 249
  • [23] DOSE EQUIVALENT UNIT
    CRITES, TR
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1980, 38 (03): : 431 - 432
  • [24] DOSE EQUIVALENT INDEX
    NEUFELD, J
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1972, 23 (06): : 861 - +
  • [25] DOSE EQUIVALENT UNIT
    DUNSTER, HJ
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1979, 36 (04): : 536 - 537
  • [26] DOSE EQUIVALENT UNIT
    BROWN, JG
    CRAIG, AG
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1979, 36 (06): : 742 - 742
  • [27] DOSE EQUIVALENT UNIT
    LOEVINGER, R
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1979, 37 (04): : 602 - 603
  • [28] Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose
    Fryer, Christopher
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2015, 62 (03) : 547 - 547
  • [29] EFFECTIVE DOSE EQUIVALENT
    SHIELDS, RA
    LAWSON, RS
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 1987, 8 (11) : 851 - 855
  • [30] DOSE EQUIVALENT UNIT
    ESPOSITO, A
    LUCCI, F
    MEROLLI, S
    PELLICIONI, M
    RINDI, A
    ROCCELLA, M
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1978, 35 (04): : 580 - 581