Advice Complexity of Priority Algorithms

被引:3
|
作者
Borodin, Allan [1 ]
Boyar, Joan [2 ]
Larsen, Kim S. [2 ]
Pankratov, Denis [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Comp Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Odense, Denmark
[3] Concordia Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Priority algorithms; Advice complexity; Greedy algorithms; Optimization problems; GREEDY ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00224-019-09955-7
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The priority model of "greedy-like" algorithms was introduced by Borodin, Nielsen, and Rackoff in 2002. We augment this model by allowing priority algorithms to have access to advice, i.e., side information precomputed by an all-powerful oracle. Obtaining lower bounds in the priority model without advice can be challenging and may involve intricate adversary arguments. Since the priority model with advice is even more powerful, obtaining lower bounds presents additional difficulties. We sidestep these difficulties by developing a general framework of reductions which makes lower bound proofs relatively straightforward and routine. We start by introducing the Pair Matching problem, for which we are able to prove strong lower bounds in the priority model with advice. We develop a template for constructing a reduction from Pair Matching to other problems in the priority model with advice - this part is technically challenging since the reduction needs to define a valid priority function for Pair Matching while respecting the priority function for the other problem. Finally, we apply the template to obtain lower bounds for a number of standard discrete optimization problems.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 625
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Learning Online Algorithms with Distributional Advice
    Diakonikolas, Ilias
    Kontonis, Vasilis
    Tzamos, Christos
    Vakilian, Ali
    Zarifis, Nikos
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 139, 2021, 139
  • [32] Online algorithms with advice: The tape model
    Boeckenhauer, Hans-Joachim
    Komm, Dennis
    Kralovic, Rastislav
    Kralovic, Richard
    Moemke, Tobias
    INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 2017, 254 : 59 - 83
  • [33] ON THE COMPLEXITY OF IQML ALGORITHMS
    CLARK, MP
    SCHARF, LL
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1992, 40 (07) : 1811 - 1813
  • [34] Probability, Algorithms and Complexity
    Strassen, Volker
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTIETH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, 2009, : 565 - 565
  • [35] Complexity theory and algorithms
    Mayr, EW
    EURO-PAR 2002 PARALLEL PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2400 : 391 - 391
  • [36] Complexity of neurocontrol algorithms
    Hrycej, T
    Ag, DB
    IEEE WORLD CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 1998, : 949 - 953
  • [37] ALGORITHMS OF MINIMAL COMPLEXITY
    MARANDZHYAN, GB
    DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1973, 213 (04): : 787 - 788
  • [38] ON THE COMPLEXITY OF SEARCH ALGORITHMS
    CHUNG, KL
    CHEN, WC
    LIN, FC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 1992, 41 (09) : 1172 - 1176
  • [39] CRYPTOLOGY AND COMPLEXITY OF ALGORITHMS
    RUGGIU, G
    REVUE TECHNIQUE THOMSON-CSF, 1979, 11 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [40] ON COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY OF ALGORITHMS
    HARTMANIS, J
    STEARNS, RE
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 1965, 117 (05) : 285 - +