The athletic coping skills inventory: relationship with impression management and self-deception aspects of socially desirable responding

被引:6
|
作者
Bourgeois, AE [1 ]
Loss, R
Meyers, MC
LeUnes, AD
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] W Texas A&M Univ, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Canyon, TX 79016 USA
关键词
coping skills; social desirability; impression management; self-deception;
D O I
10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00024-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: The primary objective was to document the relationship between the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) indices of impression management (IM) and self-deception (SDE) response styles and the Athletic Coping Skills Inventory (ACSI-28) subscales. It was hypothesized that the ACSI-28 subscales would be significantly related to BIDR IM and SDE. Design: Cross-sectional. The relationship between ACSI-28 subscales and the BIDR was assessed using SAS Multiple Regression Analyses procedures. A combination of IM and SDE served as predictors of the ACSI-28 subscale outcome variables. Method: Undergraduate volunteers (n=468) completed a test booklet consisting of the BIDR and the ACSI-28. Results: The ACSI-28 was found to be relatively free of the more traditional IM response bias, however all ACSI-28 subscales were strongly affected by SDE bias. Conclusions: Additional studies are needed to determine whether self-deceptive responding is a source of psychometric confounding or is perhaps an adaptive psychological coping skill. It is suggested that both the IM and SDE constructs be considered in the design of sport psychology research involving self-report measures. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Rasch Modeling of the Self-Deception Scale of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding
    Cervellione, Kelly L.
    Lee, Young-Sun
    Bonanno, George A.
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2009, 69 (03) : 438 - 458
  • [2] Moral hypocrisy: impression management or self-deception?
    Lonnqvist, Jan-Erik
    Irlenbusch, Bernd
    Walkowitz, Gari
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 55 : 53 - 62
  • [3] Socially desirable responding and impression management in the endorsement of love styles
    Davies, MF
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 135 (05): : 562 - 570
  • [4] Detecting socially desirable responding with the personality assessment inventory: The positive impression management scale and the defensiveness index
    Peebles, J
    Moore, RJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 54 (05) : 621 - 628
  • [5] Effects of faking on self-deception and impression management scales
    Pauls, CA
    Crost, NW
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2004, 37 (06) : 1137 - 1151
  • [6] NEED FOR SOCIAL APPROVAL - IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT OR SELF-DECEPTION
    MILLHAM, J
    KELLOGG, RW
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1980, 14 (04) : 445 - 457
  • [7] Impression management and self-deception in traffic behaviour inventories
    Lajunen, T
    Corry, A
    Summala, H
    Hartley, L
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1997, 22 (03) : 341 - 353
  • [8] Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management
    Farrow, Tom F. D.
    Burgess, Jenny
    Wilkinson, Iain D.
    Hunter, Michael D.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2015, 67 : 159 - 174
  • [9] School self-evaluation: self-perception or self-deception? The impact of motivation and socially desirable responding on self-evaluation results
    Faddar, Jerich
    Vanhoof, Jan
    De Maeyer, Sven
    SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS AND SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, 2018, 29 (04) : 660 - 678
  • [10] Self-deception and impression management in orthognathic surgery patients.
    Bennett, ME
    Phillips, C
    Kiyak, HA
    Dickens, ST
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 219 - 219