Response to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Patients with BRAF non-V600-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

被引:93
|
作者
Yaeger, Rona [1 ]
Kotani, Daisuke [2 ]
Mondaca, Sebastian [1 ]
Parikh, Aparna R. [3 ,4 ]
Bando, Hideaki [5 ]
Van Seventer, Emily E. [3 ,4 ]
Taniguchi, Hiroya [2 ]
Zhao, HuiYong [6 ]
Thant, Claire N. [7 ]
de Stanchina, Elisa [6 ]
Rosen, Neal [1 ,7 ]
Corcoran, Ryan B. [3 ,4 ]
Yoshino, Takayuki [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Zhan [7 ]
Ebi, Hiromichi [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Gastroenterol & Gastrointestinal Oncol, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Canc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Mol Pharmacol & Chem, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[7] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Program Mol Pharmacol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[8] Aichi Canc Ctr, Res Inst, Div Mol Therapeut, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[9] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Adv Canc Therapeut, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
KRAS WILD-TYPE; PREDICTIVE BIOMARKER; GENOMIC LANDSCAPE; COLON-CANCER; MUTATIONS; SENSITIVITY; ACTIVATION; CETUXIMAB; CHEMOTHERAPY; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: While mutations in BRAF in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) most commonly occur at the V600 amino acid, with the advent of next-generation sequencing, nonV600 BRAF mutations are increasingly identified in clinical practice. It is unclear whether these mutants, like BRAF V600E, confer resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Experimental Design: We conducted a multicenter pooled analysis of consecutive patients with non-V600 BRAF-mutated mCRCs identified between 2010 and 2017. Non-V600 BRAF mutations were divided into functional classes based on signaling mechanism and kinase activity: activating and RAS-independent (class 2) or kinase-impaired and RAS-dependent (class 3). Results: Forty patients with oncogenic non-V600 BRAFmutant mCRC received anti-EGFR antibody treatment [n = 12 (30%) class 2 and n = 28 (70%) class 3]. No significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed by mutation class. In contrast, while only 1 of 12 patients with class 2 BRAF mCRC responded, 14 of 28 patients with class 3 BRAF responded to anti-EGFR therapy ( response rate, 8% and 50%, respectively, P = 0.02). Specifically, in first- or second-line, 1 of 6 ( 17%) patients with class 2 and 7 of 9 (78%) patients with class 3 BRAF mutants responded (P = 0.04). In third- or later-line, none of 6 patients with class 2 and 7 of 19 (37%) patients with class 3 BRAF mutants responded (P = 0.14). Conclusions: Response to EGFR antibody treatment in mCRCs with class 2 BRAF mutants is rare, while a large portion of CRCs with class 3 BRAFmutants respond. Patients with colorectal cancer with class 3 BRAFmutations should be considered for anti-EGFR antibody treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:7089 / 7097
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comment on ‘Clinical significance of BRAF non-V600E mutations on the therapeutic effects of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the Biomarker Research for anti-EGFR monoclonal Antibodies by Comprehensive Cancer genomics (BREAC) study’
    Matthew Dankner
    April A. N. Rose
    British Journal of Cancer, 2018, 118 : 1276 - 1277
  • [32] ANTI-EGFR ANTIBODY RECHALLENGE IN CHEMOREFRACTORY PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER
    Kajitani, Tatsuhiro
    Makiyama, Akitaka
    Arita, Shuji
    Kumagai, Hozumi
    Oda, Hisanobu
    Shirakawa, Tsuyoshi
    Esaki, Taito
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25
  • [33] A method to assess KRAS/BRAF genotype in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) elligible for anti-EGFR therapies
    Lamy, A.
    Labourier, E.
    Prigneau, O.
    Di Fiore, F.
    Sesbouea, R.
    Sabourin, J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (04)
  • [34] Impact of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer
    Udagawa, Shohei
    Osumi, Hiroki
    Ooki, Akira
    Shimozaki, Keitaro
    Wakatsuki, Takeru
    Fukuoka, Shota
    Yoshino, Koichiro
    Tamba, Mikako
    Ogura, Mariko
    Chin, Keisho
    Yamaguchi, Kensei
    Shinozaki, Eiji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 30 (04) : 718 - 727
  • [35] Reply to `Comment on `Clinical significance of BRAF non-V600E mutations on the therapeutic effects of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the Biomarker Research for anti-EGFR monoclonal Antibodies by Comprehensive Cancer genomics (BREAC) study''
    Eiji Shinozaki
    Takayuki Yoshino
    Katsuya Tsuchihara
    British Journal of Cancer, 2018, 118 : 1278 - 1279
  • [36] Optimizing Anti-EGFR Therapy in Colorectal Cancer
    Salazar, Ramon
    Ciardiello, Fortunato
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (24) : 5415 - 5416
  • [37] Reply to 'Comment on 'Clinical significance of BRAF non-V600E mutations on the therapeutic effects of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the Biomarker Research for anti-EGFR monoclonal Antibodies by Comprehensive Cancer genomics (BREAC) study''
    Shinozaki, Eiji
    Yoshino, Takayuki
    Tsuchihara, Katsuya
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 118 (09) : 1278 - 1279
  • [38] BRAF V600E Mutation as a Predictive Factor of Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies Therapeutic Effects in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-analysis
    Qi Wang
    Wei-guo Hu
    Qi-bin Song
    Jia Wei
    Chinese Medical Sciences Journal, 2014, 29 (04) : 197 - 203
  • [39] Integrating anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Haraldsdottir, Sigurdis
    Bekaii-Saab, Tanios
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 4 (03) : 285 - 298
  • [40] The pathologist's involvement in anti-EGFR antibody therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Sacoun, Esther
    ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2010, 30 (04) : VII - X