Evaluation of the completeness of intervention reporting in Cochrane surgical systematic reviews using the TIDieR-SR checklist: a cross-sectional study

被引:5
|
作者
Vassar, Matt [1 ]
Page, Matthew J. [2 ]
Glasbey, James [3 ]
Cooper, Craig [1 ]
Jorski, Austin [1 ]
Sosio, Jessica [4 ]
Wayant, Cole [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Psychiat & Behav Sci, Ctr Hlth Sci, Tulsa, OK USA
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Acad Dept Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Kansas City Univ Med & Biosci, Med Student Res, Kansas City, MO USA
关键词
surgery; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111417
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Complete reporting of systematic reviews of interventions is essential to the interpretation of research findings and the reproducibility of research results. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist-and the version specific to systematic reviews (TIDieR-SR)-was created to provide authors and researchers an evidence-based guide for reporting trial and systematic review interventions. In this study, we apply TIDieR-SR to Cochrane systematic reviews of surgical interventions. Methods We searched the Cochrane Database for relevant systematic reviews. Two investigators applied inclusion/exclusion criteria to all titles/abstracts and full texts. These same investigators extracted all data in duplicate while masked to the other's data. The primary outcome was adherence to TIDieR-SR items. Results Two hundred and thirty-eight systematic reviews were included. Overall, included SRs adhered to a median of 6 (IQR 5-7) out of eight TIDieR-SR items. The item with the lowest adherence was item 7 (share intervention materials, 1/238 (0.4%). Discussion Our results are encouraging, but the generalisability of our findings is compromised by the inclusion of only Cochrane systematic reviews. Future reporting of intervention materials is likely to improve the application of effective surgical interventions in the clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using the TIDieR checklist to describe health visitor support for mothers with mental health problems: Analysis of a cross-sectional survey
    Lowenhoff, Catherine
    Davison-Fischer, Jan
    Pike, Nick
    Appleton, Jane V.
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2019, 27 (05) : E824 - E836
  • [42] Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews
    Pauline A. J. Steegmans
    Nicola Di Girolamo
    Reint A. Meursinge Reynders
    [J]. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4
  • [43] Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews
    Steegmans, Pauline A. J.
    Di Girolamo, Nicola
    Reynders, Reint A. Meursinge
    [J]. RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [44] Methodological quality of systematic reviews on interventions for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
    Wu, Irene X. Y.
    Wang, Huan
    Zhu, Lin
    Chen, Yancong
    Wong, Charlene H. L.
    Mao, Chen
    Chung, Vincent C. H.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE, 2020, 12
  • [45] METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DRUG SAFETY SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    Li, L.
    Deng, K.
    Zhou, X.
    Xu, C.
    Sun, X.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S85 - S85
  • [46] Methodological quality of systematic reviews on sepsis treatments: A cross-sectional study
    Ho, Leonard
    Chen, Xi
    Kwok, Yan Ling
    Wu, Irene X. Y.
    Mao, Chen
    Chung, Vincent Chi Ho
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 77 : 21 - 28
  • [47] Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study
    Tsoi, Anna K. N.
    Ho, Leonard T. F.
    Wu, Irene X. Y.
    Wong, Charlene H. L.
    Ho, Robin S. T.
    Lim, Joanne Y. Y.
    Mao, Chen
    Lee, Eric K. P.
    Chung, Vincent C. H.
    [J]. BONE, 2020, 139
  • [48] Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study
    Chung, V. C. H.
    Wu, X. Y.
    Feng, Y.
    Ho, R. S. T.
    Wong, S. Y. S.
    Threapleton, D.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2018, 27 (06) : 619 - 627
  • [49] Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study
    Leonard Ho
    Fiona Y. T. Ke
    Charlene H. L. Wong
    Irene X. Y. Wu
    Andy K. L. Cheung
    Chen Mao
    Vincent C. H. Chung
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
  • [50] Trial Registry Use in Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Gray, Harrison M.
    Simpson, Alainna
    Bowers, Aaron
    Johnson, Austin L.
    Vassar, Matt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 247 : 323 - 331