Evaluation of the completeness of intervention reporting in Cochrane surgical systematic reviews using the TIDieR-SR checklist: a cross-sectional study

被引:5
|
作者
Vassar, Matt [1 ]
Page, Matthew J. [2 ]
Glasbey, James [3 ]
Cooper, Craig [1 ]
Jorski, Austin [1 ]
Sosio, Jessica [4 ]
Wayant, Cole [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Psychiat & Behav Sci, Ctr Hlth Sci, Tulsa, OK USA
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Acad Dept Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Kansas City Univ Med & Biosci, Med Student Res, Kansas City, MO USA
关键词
surgery; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111417
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Complete reporting of systematic reviews of interventions is essential to the interpretation of research findings and the reproducibility of research results. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist-and the version specific to systematic reviews (TIDieR-SR)-was created to provide authors and researchers an evidence-based guide for reporting trial and systematic review interventions. In this study, we apply TIDieR-SR to Cochrane systematic reviews of surgical interventions. Methods We searched the Cochrane Database for relevant systematic reviews. Two investigators applied inclusion/exclusion criteria to all titles/abstracts and full texts. These same investigators extracted all data in duplicate while masked to the other's data. The primary outcome was adherence to TIDieR-SR items. Results Two hundred and thirty-eight systematic reviews were included. Overall, included SRs adhered to a median of 6 (IQR 5-7) out of eight TIDieR-SR items. The item with the lowest adherence was item 7 (share intervention materials, 1/238 (0.4%). Discussion Our results are encouraging, but the generalisability of our findings is compromised by the inclusion of only Cochrane systematic reviews. Future reporting of intervention materials is likely to improve the application of effective surgical interventions in the clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conduct and reporting of citation searching in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study
    Briscoe, Simon
    Bethel, Alison
    Rogers, Morwenna
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2020, 11 (02) : 169 - 180
  • [2] Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
    Shah, Kieran
    Egan, Gregory
    Huan, Lawrence
    Kirkham, Jamie
    Reid, Emma
    Tejani, Aaron M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [3] There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology
    Adobes Martin, Milagros
    Santamans Faustino, Sala
    Llario Alminana, Inmaculada
    Aiuto, Riccardo
    Rotundo, Roberto
    Garcovich, Daniele
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology
    Milagros Adobes Martin
    Sala Santamans Faustino
    Inmaculada Llario Almiñana
    Riccardo Aiuto
    Roberto Rotundo
    Daniele Garcovich
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
  • [5] Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study
    Jennifer Petkovic
    Jessica Trawin
    Omar Dewidar
    Manosila Yoganathan
    Peter Tugwell
    Vivian Welch
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [6] Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of non-Cochrane updates of systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study
    Rombey, Tanja
    Lochner, Valerie
    Puljak, Livia
    Koensgen, Nadja
    Mathes, Tim
    Pieper, Dawid
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2020, 11 (03) : 471 - 483
  • [7] Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study
    Petkovic, Jennifer
    Trawin, Jessica
    Dewidar, Omar
    Yoganathan, Manosila
    Tugwell, Peter
    Welch, Vivian
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [8] Lack of sex-related analysis and reporting in Cochrane Reviews: a cross-sectional study
    Antequera, Alba
    Ana Cuadrado-Conde, M.
    Roy-Vallejo, Emilia
    Montoya-Martinez, Maria
    Leon-Garcia, Montserrat
    Madrid-Pascual, Olaya
    Calderon-Larranaga, Sara
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [9] Lack of sex-related analysis and reporting in Cochrane Reviews: a cross-sectional study
    Alba Antequera
    M. Ana Cuadrado-Conde
    Emilia Roy-Vallejo
    María Montoya-Martínez
    Montserrat León-García
    Olaya Madrid-Pascual
    Sara Calderón-Larrañaga
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [10] REPORTING QUALITY OF DRUG SAFETY SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    Li, L.
    Xu, C.
    Deng, K.
    Zhou, X.
    Sun, X.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S85 - S85