Recommendations from a multi-study evaluation of proposed criteria for Staging Reproductive Aging

被引:88
|
作者
Harlow, S. D.
Crawford, S.
Dennerstein, L. [1 ]
Burger, H. G.
Mitchell, E. S.
Sowers, M.-F.
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Med Ctr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
menopausal transition; menopause; menstrual cycle; aging; ovarian function; follicle stimulating hormone;
D O I
10.1080/13697130701258838
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In 2001, the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW) proposed bleeding and endocrine criteria for defining the early and late menopausal transition stages. Based on expert consensus, STRAW recommended a shorter interval of amenorrhea than the commonly used 90-day amenorrhea criteria for late transition and a > 7-day change in cycle length for early transition. The ReSTAGE collaboration used prospective menstrual calendar data from four cohorts (TREMIN, Melbourne Women's Midlife Health Project, Seattle Midlife Women's Health Study, and Study of Women's Health Across the Nation) to quantitatively evaluate STRAW's recommendations. This empirical assessment supported the STRAW recommendations that (1) >= 60 days of amenorrhea be used to define the late menopausal transition and (2) that early transition is consistent with a persistent 7 or more day difference in length of consecutive cycles. Serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) values >= 40 IU/I was an independent marker of the transition and, when occurring together with a bleeding marker, increased prediction of final menstrual period. Such a FSH criterion could be incorporated into the STRAW paradigm to facilitate prediction of proximity of the final menstrual period.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Multi-Study Model-Based Evaluation of the Sequence of Imaging and Clinical Biomarker Changes in Huntington's Disease
    Wijeratne, Peter A.
    Johnson, Eileanoir B.
    Gregory, Sarah
    Georgiou-Karistianis, Nellie
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    Scahill, Rachael, I
    Tabrizi, Sarah J.
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    FRONTIERS IN BIG DATA, 2021, 4
  • [22] Cultural differences and subjective evaluation criteria: findings from a European multi-centre study
    Briscoe, J
    Wright, D
    McCabe, R
    Priebe, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 12 (04): : 43 - 43
  • [23] Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis
    Squires, Janet E.
    Hayduk, Leslie
    Hutchinson, Alison M.
    Mallick, Ranjeeta
    Norton, Peter G.
    Cummings, Greta G.
    Estabrooks, Carole A.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [24] Evaluation of the new TNM staging system proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer at a single institution
    Kameyama, Kotaro
    Takahashi, Mamoru
    Ohata, Keiji
    Igai, Hitoshi
    Yamashina, Akihiko
    Matsuoka, Tomoaki
    Nakagawa, Tatsuo
    Okumura, Norihito
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 137 (05): : 1180 - 1184
  • [25] Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes: Evidence from a French epidemiological study (DESIR)
    Balkau, B
    Eschwege, E
    Tichet, J
    Marre, M
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 1997, 23 (05) : 428 - 434
  • [26] Positive youth development from a "3Cs" programming perspective: a multi-study investigation in the university
    Kong, Siu-Cheung
    Wang, Yi-Qing
    COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, 29 (04) : 335 - 356
  • [27] Benchmarking Multi-criteria Evaluation: A Proposed Method for the Definition of Benchmarks in Negotiation Public-Private Partnerships
    Guarini, Maria Rosaria
    Battisti, Fabrizio
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2014, PT III, 2014, 8581 : 208 - 223
  • [28] Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
    Nalmpantis, Dimitrios
    Roukouni, Anastasia
    Genitsaris, Evangelos
    Stamelou, Afroditi
    Naniopoulos, Aristotelis
    EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [29] Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
    Dimitrios Nalmpantis
    Anastasia Roukouni
    Evangelos Genitsaris
    Afroditi Stamelou
    Aristotelis Naniopoulos
    European Transport Research Review, 2019, 11
  • [30] Literature study on the theory of GIS-based multi evaluation criteria
    Widianingsih, I.
    Masri, R. M.
    Abdullah, A. G.
    ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 1375