On Group Sequential Designs Comparing Two Binomial Proportions

被引:7
|
作者
Kepner, James L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Canc Soc, Stat & Evaluat Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
Efficacy; Exact test; Futility; Group sequential design; Phase II clinical trial; Phase III clinical trial; Size of a test; Statistical power;
D O I
10.1080/10543400903280621
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Discussed is the problem of sample size determination for one- and two-stage hypothesis tests comparing two binomial proportions using two independent random samples. A FORTRAN compiled search algorithm identifies exact group sequential designs that allow early stopping only for futility or only for efficacy or for either futility or efficacy. The resulting designs yield a substantial savings in terms of total sample size in many practical cases, are seen to satisfy a number of desirable properties, and are compared to other exact one- and two-stage designs and to designs derived based upon asymptotic normal theory methods.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 159
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Group sequential designs for negative binomial outcomes
    Muetze, Tobias
    Glimm, Ekkehard
    Schmidli, Heinz
    Friede, Tim
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (08) : 2326 - 2347
  • [2] Group sequential comparison of two binomial proportions under ranked set sampling design
    Hussein, A.
    Muttlak, H. A.
    Saleh, M.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2013, 28 (03) : 1169 - 1194
  • [3] Group sequential comparison of two binomial proportions under ranked set sampling design
    A. Hussein
    H. A. Muttlak
    M. Saleh
    [J]. Computational Statistics, 2013, 28 : 1169 - 1194
  • [4] Nearly optimal truncated group sequential test on binomial proportions
    Hu, Sigui
    Wang, Honglei
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2018, 47 (08) : 2332 - 2342
  • [5] A note on comparing two binomial proportions in confirmatory noninferiority trials
    Li, Zhengqing
    Chuang-Stein, Christy
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2006, 40 (02): : 203 - 208
  • [6] A Note on Comparing Two Binomial Proportions in Confirmatory Noninferiority Trials
    Zhengqing Li
    Christy Chuang-Stein
    [J]. Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2006, 40 (2): : 203 - 208
  • [7] Bayesian Sample Size Calculations for Comparing Two Binomial Proportions
    Zhao Zhanping
    Chen Rong jiang
    Tang Niansheng
    [J]. RECENT ADVANCE IN STATISTICS APPLICATION AND RELATED AREAS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 481 - +
  • [8] Sequential risk-efficient estimation for the ratio of two binomial proportions
    Cho, Hokwon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2007, 137 (07) : 2336 - 2346
  • [9] On the maximum total sample size of a group sequential test about binomial proportions
    Kepner, JL
    Chang, MN
    [J]. STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2003, 62 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [10] Improved p-Value Tests for Comparing Two Independent Binomial Proportions
    Lin, Che-Yang
    Yang, Ming-Chung
    [J]. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 2008, 38 (01) : 78 - 91