Tbo-filgrastim versus filgrastim for stem cell mobilization and engraftment in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: A retrospective review

被引:1
|
作者
Potter, Ashley [1 ]
Beck, Bradley [2 ,3 ]
Ngorsuraches, Surachat [4 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Methodist Campus,201 West Ctr St, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[2] Avera McKennan Hosp, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[3] Univ Hlth Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[4] Auburn Univ, Harrison Sch Pharm, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Granulocyte; neutrophil; stem cell; transplant; HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES; AMERICAN SOCIETY; BLOOD;
D O I
10.1177/1078155219833444
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Filgrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, is commonly used in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) to assist with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection and to support stem cell engraftment. In the United States, tbo-filgrastim is approved under its own Biologic License Application and is limited to a single indication excluding the HSCT population. Methods Approximately one year after a system-wide formulary change to tbo-filgrastim for all on- and off-label indications, our institution conducted an IRB-approved retrospective comparison of tbo-filgrastim to filgrastim in the autologous HSCT setting. The study included 71 patients who received an autologous HSCT from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2016 with a documented administration of tbo-filgrastim or filgrastim. Results There were no statistically significant differences noted on CD34 + counts during stem cell mobilization, neutrophil engraftment, infection rates during the engraftment phase, nor duration of hospitalization during the engraftment phase. More patients in the tbo-filgrastim group received plerixafor per protocol resulting in more patients meeting their PBPC collection goal in one day with fewer collection days overall, a result potentially confounded by institutional protocol changes. Utilizing tbo-filgrastim offered an average cost savings per patient of $2664.26 ($1907.33 for PBPC mobilization and $756.93 for stem cell engraftment) when comparing dollars spent on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor products only. Conclusion Tbo-filgrastim demonstrates comparable efficacy with a cost savings benefit compared to filgrastim for autologous PBPC mobilization and stem cell engraftment.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Results of a Prospective Randomized, Open-Label, Noninferiority Study of Tbo-Filgrastim (Granix) versus Filgrastim (Neupogen) in Combination with Plerixafor for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
    Bhamidipati, Pavan Kumar
    Fiala, Mark A.
    Grossman, Brenda J.
    DiPersio, John F.
    Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith
    Gao, Feng
    Uy, Geoffrey L.
    Westervelt, Peter
    Schroeder, Mark A.
    Cashen, Amanda F.
    Abboud, Camille N.
    Vij, Ravi
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (12) : 2065 - 2069
  • [22] Efficacy of a conversion from filgrastim to filgrastim-sndz in stem cell transplant patients undergoing mobilization
    Curry, Lauren D.
    Anders, Brandi
    Dressler, Emily, V
    Kennedy, LeAnne
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (04) : 871 - 876
  • [23] Biosimilar Filgrastim in Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization and Post-Transplant Hematologic Recovery
    Marchesi, Francesco
    Mengarelli, Andrea
    CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 23 (21) : 2217 - 2229
  • [24] Successful hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with vinorelbine and filgrastim in germ cell tumor
    Carneiro-Silva, Fabiana Aguiar
    Brunetta, Denise Menezes
    Kaufman, Jacques
    Vasconcelos Leitao, Joao Paulo
    Nunes Barroso, Karine Sampaio
    Tavares Barbosa, Suzanna Araujo
    de Barros Carlos, Luciana Maria
    Barroso-Duarte, Fernando
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 17 (03) : 417 - 418
  • [25] Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®) Vs. Tbo-Filgrastim (Granix®) Post Autologous Transplant
    Schmidt, Sarah
    Newman, Katherine
    Machiorlatti, Michael
    Vesely, Sara K.
    Chakrabarty, Jennifer Holter
    Selby, George B.
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 24 (03) : S280 - S281
  • [26] Successful hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with vinorelbine and filgrastim in germ cell tumor
    Fabiana Aguiar Carneiro-Silva
    Denise Menezes Brunetta
    Jacques Kaufman
    João Paulo Vasconcelos Leitão
    Karine Sampaio Nunes Barroso
    Suzanna Araújo Tavares Barbosa
    Luciana Maria de Barros Carlos
    Fernando Barroso-Duarte
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2017, 17 : 417 - 418
  • [27] Filgrastim in patients after autologous stem cell transplantation
    Svabova, H.
    Zmijakova, A.
    Zitkova, M.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 48 : S493 - S493
  • [28] Pegfilgrastim versus Filgrastim in autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation
    Rios-Contreras, Jose G.
    Granja-Moran, Manuel A.
    Acosta-Maldonado, Brenda L.
    Rivera-Fong, Liliana
    Valero-Saldana, Luis M.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 53 : 357 - 358
  • [29] Comparison of originator and biosimilar filgrastim for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma
    Lisenko, K.
    Baertsch, M. -A.
    Schmitt, A.
    Pavel, P.
    Bruckner, T.
    Hillengass, J.
    Wuchter, P.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 40 : 178 - 178
  • [30] Effect on Patients' Outcomes of a Change to Biosimilar Filgrastim Product in Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization
    Fenna, Jennifer
    Guirguis, Micheal
    Ibrahim, Caroline
    Shirvaikar, Neeta
    Sandhu, Irwindeep
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Jenkins, Melissa
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2021, 74 (02): : 122 - 129