Tbo-filgrastim versus filgrastim for stem cell mobilization and engraftment in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: A retrospective review

被引:1
|
作者
Potter, Ashley [1 ]
Beck, Bradley [2 ,3 ]
Ngorsuraches, Surachat [4 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Methodist Campus,201 West Ctr St, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[2] Avera McKennan Hosp, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[3] Univ Hlth Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[4] Auburn Univ, Harrison Sch Pharm, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Granulocyte; neutrophil; stem cell; transplant; HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES; AMERICAN SOCIETY; BLOOD;
D O I
10.1177/1078155219833444
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Filgrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, is commonly used in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) to assist with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection and to support stem cell engraftment. In the United States, tbo-filgrastim is approved under its own Biologic License Application and is limited to a single indication excluding the HSCT population. Methods Approximately one year after a system-wide formulary change to tbo-filgrastim for all on- and off-label indications, our institution conducted an IRB-approved retrospective comparison of tbo-filgrastim to filgrastim in the autologous HSCT setting. The study included 71 patients who received an autologous HSCT from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2016 with a documented administration of tbo-filgrastim or filgrastim. Results There were no statistically significant differences noted on CD34 + counts during stem cell mobilization, neutrophil engraftment, infection rates during the engraftment phase, nor duration of hospitalization during the engraftment phase. More patients in the tbo-filgrastim group received plerixafor per protocol resulting in more patients meeting their PBPC collection goal in one day with fewer collection days overall, a result potentially confounded by institutional protocol changes. Utilizing tbo-filgrastim offered an average cost savings per patient of $2664.26 ($1907.33 for PBPC mobilization and $756.93 for stem cell engraftment) when comparing dollars spent on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor products only. Conclusion Tbo-filgrastim demonstrates comparable efficacy with a cost savings benefit compared to filgrastim for autologous PBPC mobilization and stem cell engraftment.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tbo-Filgrastim versus Filgrastim during Mobilization and Neutrophil Engraftment for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
    Elayan, Mohammed M.
    Horowitz, Justin G.
    Magraner, Jose M.
    Shaughnessy, Paul J.
    Bachier, Carlos
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 21 (11) : 1921 - 1925
  • [2] Tbo-Filgrastim Versus Filgrastim during Mobilization and Neutrophil Engraftment in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
    Elayan, Mohammed M.
    Magraner, Jose M.
    Horowitz, Justin G.
    Taylor, Candace
    McGavran, Penny
    Shaughnessy, Paul J.
    Bachier, Carlos
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 21 (02) : S134 - S134
  • [3] Efficacy of a Tbo-Filgrastim Protocol for Stem Cell Engraftment in Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
    Corbin, Morgan
    Peyton-Thomas, Breanne
    Selby, Christopher
    Bozeman, Amy
    Leary, Cheri
    Devarakonda, Srinivas
    Mansour, Richard
    Mills, Glenn
    Koshy, Nebu
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (03) : S345 - S346
  • [4] Outcomes of tbo-filgrastim, filgrastim-sndz or filgrastim for mobilization in patients undergoing an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant: A single center experience.
    Neme, Klodiana
    Henkin, David
    Mikulandric, Nancy
    Grycki, Meredith
    Michael, Angela
    Smith, Cassandra
    Emole, Josephine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [5] Filgrastim versus TBO-filgrastim to reduce the duration of neutropenia after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: TBO, or not TBO, that is the question
    Trifilio, Steven
    Zhou, Zheng
    Galvin, John
    Fong, Jessica L.
    Monreal, Joanne
    Mehta, Jayesh
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (12) : 1128 - 1132
  • [6] A Retrospective Review of Engraftment Data for Tbo-Filgrastim Vs. Filgrastim in Patients Undergoing High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
    Teschner, Taylor
    Lo, Stephen
    Brauneis, Dina
    Shelton, Anthony C.
    Shah, Bhavesh
    Sloan, John Mark
    Varga, Cindy
    Quillen, Karen
    Sanchorawala, Vaishali
    BLOOD, 2015, 126 (23)
  • [7] A Randomized Trial of Tbo-Filgrastim Versus Filgrastim for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
    Fiala, Mark A.
    Schwab, David
    Vij, Ravi
    Cashen, Amanda F.
    Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith
    Abboud, Camille N.
    BLOOD, 2015, 126 (23)
  • [8] Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization with Tbo-Filgrastim is Equvalent to Filgrastim: Results From a Randomized Phase II Trial
    Fiala, Mark A.
    Vij, Ravi
    Cashen, Amanda
    Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith
    DiPersio, John F.
    Abboud, Camille
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (03) : S128 - S128
  • [9] Engraftment with Filgrastim-Sndz Versus Filgrastim in Adult Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Patients
    Ahmad, Samrah
    Bayer, Ruthee-Lu
    Tiwari, Mukesh
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 24 (03) : S282 - S283
  • [10] Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization
    Husian, Sadik
    Jeyaraman, Preethi
    Gupta, S. K.
    Rai, Reeta
    Pathak, Sangeeta
    Dayal, Nitin
    Naithani, Rahul
    SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 10 (03) : 172 - 174