Effectiveness of SurgicelA® (Fibrillar) in patients with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

被引:10
|
作者
Myung, Yu Sik [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ko, Bong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Han, Jae Pil [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hong, Su Jin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jeon, Seong Ran [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jin Oh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moon, Jong Ho [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Moon Sung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Ctr Digest Dis, Dept Internal Med, 1174 Jung Dong, Bucheon 420767, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ, Res Inst, 1174 Jung Dong, Bucheon 420767, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[3] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Hosp, 1174 Jung Dong, Bucheon 420767, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Colorectal ESD; Complication; Surgicel; LARGE MUCOSAL DEFECTS; EPITHELIAL NEOPLASMS; TUMORS; CLOSURE; OUTCOMES; AGENTS; COLON;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-015-4369-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Because the invasive procedure of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) entails a extensive mucosal defect and submucosal exposure, the procedure may have a substantial risk of complications including delayed bleeding, perforation and bacteremia and/or endotoxemia. The aim of our study was to investigate whether Surgicel(A (R)) would be effective in reducing complications after colorectal ESD. Between 2012 and 2013, 52 consecutive patients who underwent a colorectal ESD were enrolled. After the removal of colorectal epithelial neoplasm, surgicel was sprayed onto the submucosal surface using the wet type of application (Surgicel(A (R)) group). We evaluated tumor type, location, size, histology, procedure time, hospital stay and associated complication. For assessing inflammatory reaction, white blood cells and body temperature were monitored. In assessing the effectiveness of Surgicel(A (R)) application, we retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes with 52 other consecutive large colorectal tumor patients who had previously received conventional ESD, as control group (non-Surgicel(A (R)) group). Of the 52 patients, three patients were excluded. Forty-nine patients were ultimately enrolled in this study. During the follow-up period, rebleeding occurred in 0 (0 % in Surgicel(A (R)) group) patients and 4 (7.7 % in non-Surgicel(A (R)) group) patients; fever (> 37.7) in 2 (4.1 %) and 10 (19.2 %) patients, respectively (p = 0.019); and leukocytosis in 9 (18.4 %) and 16 (30.8 %) patients, respectively (p = 0.172). C-reactive protein level was 0.35 +/- A 0.18 and 9.83 +/- A 2.44 (p < 0.001). The mean hospitalization period was 4.22 +/- A 0.94 and 5.13 +/- A 0.27 days, respectively (p < 0.001). The group (surgicel vs. non-surgicel, p = 0.005, odds ratio 11.114 (2.104-58.718)) was identified as independent predictor for complication such as fever or delayed bleeding by multivariated analysis. Surgicel(A (R)) application after colorectal ESD may be an effective method to reduce some complications and mean hospitalization period. Therefore, surgicel application may be considered to be a valuable clinical method.
引用
收藏
页码:1534 / 1541
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasm
    Zhou, Ping-Hong
    Yao, Li-Qing
    Qin, Xin-Yu
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (07): : 1546 - 1551
  • [42] Tips for difficult colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Yoshizaki, Tetsuya
    Toyonaga, Takashi
    Ikezawa, Nobuaki
    Nakano, Yoshiko
    Tanaka, Shinwa
    Ishida, Tsukasa
    Rahni, David Ozzie
    Jacob, Harold
    Rahmi, Gabriel
    Kodama, Yuzo
    MINI-INVASIVE SURGERY, 2022, 6
  • [43] Learning Curve Associated With Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Endoscopists Experienced in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
    Sakamoto, Taku
    Saito, Yutaka
    Fukunaga, Shusei
    Nakajima, Takeshi
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (10) : 1307 - 1312
  • [44] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms:A review
    Taku Sakamoto
    Genki Mori
    Masayoshi Yamada
    Yuzuru Kinjo
    Eriko So
    Seiichiro Abe
    Yosuke Otake
    Takeshi Nakajima
    Takahisa Matsuda
    Yutaka Saito
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (43) : 16153 - 16158
  • [45] Clinical Updates in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
    Yang, Dennis
    Draganov, Peter, V
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (02) : 269 - 271
  • [46] Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection and hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection as rescue therapy in difficult colorectal cases
    Cecinato, Paolo
    Lucarini, Matteo
    Campanale, Chiara
    Azzolini, Francesco
    Bassi, Fabio
    Sassatelli, Romano
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (09) : E1225 - E1232
  • [47] Feasibility of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Elderly Patients: The Impact of Sarcopenia
    Hisada, Hiroyuki
    Tsuji, Yosuke
    Cho, Rina
    Miura, Yuko
    Mizutani, Hiroya
    Ohki, Daisuke
    Yakabi, Seiichi
    Takahashi, Yu
    Sakaguchi, Yoshiki
    Kakushima, Naomi
    Yamamichi, Nobutake
    Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
    DIGESTION, 2024, 105 (03) : 175 - 185
  • [48] Assessment of the Safety of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Very Elderly Patients
    Fujii, Yuko
    Nishimura, Makoto
    Kowazaki, Yuka
    Matsukawa, Miho
    Matsuoka, Junko
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB428 - AB428
  • [49] Predictive factors for dissection speed for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Sunada, Keijiro
    Yamashina, Takeshi
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Sakamoto, Hirotsugu
    Miura, Yoshimasa
    Shinozaki, Satoshi
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 : 288 - 289
  • [50] Should endoscopic submucosal dissection be offered to patients with early colorectal cancer?
    Ulkucu, Attila
    Erkaya, Metincan
    Erozkan, Kamil
    Catalano, Brogan
    Liska, David
    Allende, Daniela
    Steele, Scott R.
    Sommovilla, Joshua
    Gorgun, Emre
    SURGERY, 2025, 179