Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability

被引:129
|
作者
Scheufler, Kai-Michael
Dohmen, Hildegard
Vougioukas, Vassilios I.
机构
[1] Hirslanden Med Ctr Aarau, Dept Neurosurg, CH-5000 Aarau, Switzerland
[2] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Dept Neuropathol, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
degenerative disc; instrumentation; interbody fusion; modified percutaneous transforaminal; lumbar interbody fixation;
D O I
10.1227/01.NEU.0000255388.03088.B7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous spinal instrumentation techniques may be helpful to reduce approach-related morbidity inherent to conventional open surgery. This article reports technique, clinical outcomes, and fusion rates of percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation (pTLIF). Results are compared with those of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation (oTLIF) using a muscle splitting (Wiltse) approach. METHODS: pTLIF was performed in 43 patients with single-level and 10 patients with bi- or multilevel lumbar discopathy or degenerative pseudolisthesis resulting in axial back pain and claudication, pseudoradicular, or radicular symptoms. Decompression, discectomy, and interbody cage insertion were performed through 18-mm tubular retractors followed by percutaneous pedicle screw-rod fixation. Clinical outcome was assessed by early postoperative pain scores (visual analog,score) and standardized functional outcome questionnaires (American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons lumbar spine and Roland-Morris low back pain score). Fusion rates were assessed by thin-slice computed tomographic scan at 16 months. Clinical outcome, time in the operating room, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative access-site pain were compared with an institutional reference series of 67 oTLIF procedures. RESULTS: Excellent and good clinical results were obtained in 46 (87%) out of 53 patients at 16 months. The time spent in the operating room was equivalent and the blood loss reduced compared with oTLIF (P < 0.01). There was no morbidity related to instrumentation. Postoperative pain was significantly lower after pTLIF after the second postoperative day (P < 0.01). The overall clinical outcome was not different from oTLIF at 8 and 16 months. CONCLUSION: pTLIF allows for safe and efficient minimally invasive treatment of single and multilevel degenerative lumbar instability with good clinical results. Further prospective studies investigating long-term functional results are required to assess the definitive merits of percutaneous instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 212
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study
    Hao Chen
    Goudi Zheng
    Zhenyu Bian
    Changju Hou
    Maoqiang Li
    Zhen Zhang
    Liulong Zhu
    Xuepeng Wang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [42] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study
    Chen, Hao
    Zheng, Goudi
    Bian, Zhenyu
    Hou, Changju
    Li, Maoqiang
    Zhang, Zhen
    Zhu, Liulong
    Wang, Xuepeng
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [43] Application and thinking of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases
    Gu, Shao
    Li, Haifeng
    Wang, Daxing
    Dai, Xuejun
    Liu, Chengwei
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [44] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558
  • [45] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Unilateral Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Wang, Hui-wang
    Hu, Yong-cheng
    Wu, Zhan-yong
    Wu, Hua-rong
    Wu, Chun-fu
    Zhang, Lian-suo
    Xu, Wei-kun
    Fan, Hui-long
    Cai, Jin-sheng
    Ma, Jian-qing
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2017, 9 (03) : 277 - 283
  • [46] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Sheng-Dan Jiang
    Jiang-Wei Chen
    Lei-Sheng Jiang
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2012, 132 : 1259 - 1266
  • [47] Comparison of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Na, Mengqi
    Zhan, Xinli
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (51)
  • [48] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kulkarni, Arvind G.
    Bohra, Hussain
    Dhruv, Abhilash
    Sarraf, Abhishek
    Bassi, Anupreet
    Patil, Vishwanath M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 50 (05) : 464 - 472
  • [49] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Arvind G. Kulkarni
    Hussain Bohra
    Abhilash Dhruv
    Abhishek Sarraf
    Anupreet Bassi
    Vishwanath M. Patil
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016, 50 : 464 - 472
  • [50] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Chen, Jiang-Wei
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (09) : 1259 - 1266