Evaluation of prophylactic antibiotic regimens on recurrence and mortality in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Introduction and objectives: Limited data describe current SBP epidemiology and specific secondary SBP prophylactic regimens, leading to variable prescribing practices. This work aims to compare 90-day and one-year SBP recurrence and mortality based on secondary SBP antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort of patients >18 years with an SBP diagnosis from 2010 to 2015 at two academic institutions. Eligible patients had ascitic PMN counts >= 250 cells/mm(3) or a positive ascitic culture. Patients were compared based on secondary SBP prophylaxis regimens (i.e., daily, intermittent, or no prophylaxis). Results: Of 791 patients with ascitic fluid samples, 86 patients were included. Antibiotic prophylaxis included daily (n= 34), intermittent (n= 36), or no prophylaxis (n= 16). Nearly half of SBP episodes had a positive ascitic fluid culture; 50% were gram-negative pathogens, and 50% were gram-positive pathogens. Daily and intermittent regimens had similar rates of recurrence at 90-days (19.4% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.60) and one-year (33.3% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.53). Similarly, mortality did not differ among daily and intermittent regimens at 90-days (32.4% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.87) or one-year (67.6% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.74). When comparing any prophylaxis vs. no prophylaxis, there were no differences in 90-day or one-year recurrence or mortality. Conclusions: In patients with a history of SBP, our data indicate similar outcomes with daily, intermittent, or no secondary antibiotic prophylaxis. With available data, including ours, demonstrating a changing epidemiology for SBP pathogens, further data is required to determine if traditional approaches to secondary SBP prophylaxis remain appropriate. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. on behalf of Fundacion Clinica Medica Sur, A.C.