Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study

被引:200
|
作者
Siche, Raul [1 ]
Pereira, Lucas [2 ]
Agostinho, Feni [2 ]
Ortega, Enrique [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Trujillo, Fac Ciencias Agropecuarias, Escuela Ingn Agroind, Trujillo, Peru
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, Food Eng Sch, Ecol Engn Lab, BR-13083862 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Emergy analysis; Ecological footprint; Sustainability indicators; Peru; NATIONS; EXERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In the last decade, two scientific tools have been extensively used worldwide to measure the human impact on nature: ecological footprint (EF) and emergy analysis (EA). Papers trying to combine the strong points of EF and EA, and obtain more accurate results have appeared in scientific literature, in which Zhao's et al. (2005) [61] approach is an important one. Unfortunately, some weak points of the original methods still remain on the new approaches proposed. The aim of this present work is to discuss some weak points found in Zhao's approach, trying to overcome them through a new approach called emergetic ecological footprint (EEF). The main difference between Zhao's approach and EEF is that the last one accounted for the internal storage of capital natural in the biocapacity calculation. Besides that, soil loss and water for human consume were considered as additional categories in the footprint calculation. After discussing it through comparisons with other approaches, EEF was used to assess Peru as a case study, resulting in a biocapacity of 51.76 gha capita(-1) and a footprint of 12.23 gha capita(-1), with 2004 data; that resulted in an ecological surplus of 39.53 gha capita(-1). The load capacity factor obtained was 4.23, meaning that Peru can support a population 4.23 times bigger considering the life style of 2004. The main limitations of the EEF are: (i) it is impossible to make comparisons between the biocapacity and footprint for each category; (ii) a need for a handbook with emergy intensity factors with good quality. On the other hand, the main positive points are: (i) its easiness of application in global and national scales; (ii) its final indicators account for all the previous energy (or emergy) used to make something; (iii) internal natural capital storage was accounted for in the biocapacity calculation, which can be a valid step towards the evaluation and assess of services provided by nature. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3182 / 3192
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainability of agroecosystems by indices: A comparative study between indicators of ecological footprint sustainability and emergy analysis; a case study in Dez catchment, Iran
    Zadehdabagh, Nasim
    Monavari, Seyed Masoud
    Kargari, Nargess
    Taghavi, Lobat
    Pirasteh, Saeid
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2022, 474
  • [2] THE EMERGY AS AN INDICATOR OF ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY TO MEASURE SUSTAINABILITY
    Bravo Amarante, Edelvy
    Lopez Bastida, Eduardo
    Romero Romero, Osvaldo
    Calvo, Alberto E.
    Schulz, Ralf Kiran
    REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2018, 10 (05): : 78 - 84
  • [3] The ecological footprint of ports -: A sustainability indicator
    Carrera-Gomez, Gema
    Coto-Millan, Pablo
    Domenech, Juan Luis
    Inglada, Vicente
    Pesquera Gonzalez, Miguel Angel
    Castanedo-Galan, Juan
    INLAND WATERWAYS, PORTS, AND SHIPPING, 2006, (1963): : 71 - 75
  • [4] Sustainability evaluation based on the emergy ecological footprint method: A case study of Qingdao, China, from 2004 to 2014
    Peng, Wenjun
    Wang, Xiaoming
    Li, Xiaokang
    He, Chenchen
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 85 : 1249 - 1261
  • [5] Ecological footprint accounting based on emergy - A case study of the Chinese society
    Chen, B.
    Chen, G. Q.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 198 (1-2) : 101 - 114
  • [6] Evaluation of sustainability for intensive farmland ecosystem based on emergy ecological footprint
    College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing
    100193, China
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao, 18 (159-167):
  • [7] Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices
    Siche, J. R.
    Agostinho, F.
    Ortega, E.
    Romeiro, A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (04) : 628 - 637
  • [8] The ecological footprint: An indicator of progress toward regional sustainability
    Wackernagel, M
    Yount, JD
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1998, 51 (1-2) : 511 - 529
  • [9] Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries?
    Faik Bilgili
    Recep Ulucak
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 35404 - 35419
  • [10] The Ecological Footprint: an Indicator of Progress Toward Regional Sustainability
    Mathis Wackernagel
    J. David Yount
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1998, 51 : 511 - 529