Facial width-to-height ratio is associated with agonistic and affiliative dominance in bonobos (Pan paniscus)

被引:11
|
作者
Martin, J. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Staes, N. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Weiss, A. [7 ,8 ]
Stevens, J. M. G. [4 ,5 ]
Jaeggi, A. V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Anthropol, Behav Ecol Lab, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Evolutionary Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Miami Univ, Dept Anthropol, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[4] Royal Zool Soc Antwerp, Ctr Res & Conservat, Antwerp, Belgium
[5] Univ Antwerp, Dept Biol, Behav Ecol & Ecophysiol Grp, Antwerp, Belgium
[6] George Washington Univ, Dept Anthropol, Ctr Adv Study Human Paleobiol, Washington, DC USA
[7] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Philosophy Psychol & Language Sci, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[8] Scottish Primate Res Grp, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
关键词
fWHR; dominance; motivation; personality; bonobo; socioecology; TESTOSTERONE; BEHAVIOR; HORMONES;
D O I
10.1098/rsbl.2019.0232
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with social dominance in human and non-human primates, which may reflect the effects of testosterone on facial morphology and behaviour. Given that testosterone facilitates status-seeking motivation, the association between fWHR and behaviour should be contingent on the relative costs and benefits of particular dominance strategies across species and socioecological contexts. We tested this hypothesis in bonobos (Pan paniscus), who exhibit female dominance and rely on both affiliation and aggression to achieve status. We measured fWHR from facial photographs, affiliative dominance with Assertiveness personality scores and agonistic dominance with behavioural data. Consistent with our hypothesis, agonistic and affiliative dominance predicted fWHR in both sexes independent of age and body weight, supporting the role of status-seeking motivation in producing the link between fWHR and socioecologically relevant dominance behaviour across primates.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Response: Commentary: Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels
    Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.
    Sobraske, Katherine N. H.
    Samore, Theodore
    Gurven, Michael
    Gaulin, Steven J. C.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [22] No evidence that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with women's sexual desire
    Zhang, Weiqing
    Hahn, Amanda C.
    Cai, Ziyi
    Lee, Anthony J.
    Holzleitner, Iris J.
    DeBruine, Lisa M.
    Jones, Benedict C.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [23] Further Evidence that Facial Width-to-Height Ratio and Global Facial Masculinity Are Not Positively Associated with Testosterone Levels
    Tobias L. Kordsmeyer
    Daniel Freund
    Sara Rodrigues Pita
    Julia Jünger
    Lars Penke
    Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 2019, 5 : 117 - 130
  • [24] Further Evidence that Facial Width-to-Height Ratio and Global Facial Masculinity Are Not Positively Associated with Testosterone Levels
    Kordsmeyer, Tobias L.
    Freund, Daniel
    Pita, Sara Rodrigues
    Juenger, Julia
    Penke, Lars
    ADAPTIVE HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 5 (02) : 117 - 130
  • [25] Facial width-to-height ratio in chimpanzees: Links to age, sex and personality
    Wilson, Vanessa
    Weiss, Alexander
    Lefevre, Carmen E.
    Ochiai, Tomomi
    Matsuzawa, Tetsuro
    Inoue-Murayama, Miho
    Freeman, Hani
    Herrelko, Elizabeth S.
    Altschul, Drew
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 41 (03) : 226 - 234
  • [26] INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE AFFILIATIVE, PLAY, AND ACTIVITY BEHAVIORS OF CAPTIVE BONOBOS (PAN PANISCUS)
    Martin, J. S.
    Suarez, S. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2015, 77 : 87 - 87
  • [27] Facial Width-to-Height Ratio in a Large Sample of Commonwealth Games Athletes
    Kramer, Robin S. S.
    EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 13 (01): : 197 - 209
  • [28] Facial width-to-height ratio predicts achievement drive in US presidents
    Lewis, G. J.
    Lefevre, C. E.
    Bates, T. C.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 52 (07) : 855 - 857
  • [29] The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer
    Lieberz, Klara A.
    Windmann, Sabine
    Geniole, Shawn N.
    McCormick, Cheryl M.
    Mueller-Engelmann, Meike
    Gruener, Felix
    Bornefeld-Ettmann, Pia
    Steil, Regina
    AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 2017, 43 (05) : 460 - 470
  • [30] Group Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Predicts Intergroup Negotiation Outcomes
    Yang, Yu
    Tang, Chen
    Qu, Xiaofei
    Wang, Chao
    Denson, Thomas F.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9