Facial width-to-height ratio is associated with agonistic and affiliative dominance in bonobos (Pan paniscus)

被引:11
|
作者
Martin, J. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Staes, N. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Weiss, A. [7 ,8 ]
Stevens, J. M. G. [4 ,5 ]
Jaeggi, A. V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Anthropol, Behav Ecol Lab, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Evolutionary Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Miami Univ, Dept Anthropol, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[4] Royal Zool Soc Antwerp, Ctr Res & Conservat, Antwerp, Belgium
[5] Univ Antwerp, Dept Biol, Behav Ecol & Ecophysiol Grp, Antwerp, Belgium
[6] George Washington Univ, Dept Anthropol, Ctr Adv Study Human Paleobiol, Washington, DC USA
[7] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Philosophy Psychol & Language Sci, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[8] Scottish Primate Res Grp, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
关键词
fWHR; dominance; motivation; personality; bonobo; socioecology; TESTOSTERONE; BEHAVIOR; HORMONES;
D O I
10.1098/rsbl.2019.0232
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with social dominance in human and non-human primates, which may reflect the effects of testosterone on facial morphology and behaviour. Given that testosterone facilitates status-seeking motivation, the association between fWHR and behaviour should be contingent on the relative costs and benefits of particular dominance strategies across species and socioecological contexts. We tested this hypothesis in bonobos (Pan paniscus), who exhibit female dominance and rely on both affiliation and aggression to achieve status. We measured fWHR from facial photographs, affiliative dominance with Assertiveness personality scores and agonistic dominance with behavioural data. Consistent with our hypothesis, agonistic and affiliative dominance predicted fWHR in both sexes independent of age and body weight, supporting the role of status-seeking motivation in producing the link between fWHR and socioecologically relevant dominance behaviour across primates.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Facial width-to-height ratio underlies perceived dominance on facial emotional expressions
    Merlhiot, Gaetan
    Mondillon, Laurie
    Meot, Alain
    Dutheil, Frederic
    Mermillod, Martial
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 172
  • [2] Facial width-to-height ratio relates to dominance style in the genus Macaca
    Borgi, Marta
    Majolo, Bonaventura
    PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [3] Agonistic Interactions and Matrifocal Dominance Rank of Wild Bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba
    Takeshi Furuichi
    International Journal of Primatology, 1997, 18 : 855 - 875
  • [4] Agonistic interactions and matrifocal dominance rank of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba
    Furuichi, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 1997, 18 (06) : 855 - 875
  • [5] Is facial width-to-height ratio reliably associated with social inferences?
    Durkee, Patrick K.
    Ayers, Jessica D.
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 42 (06) : 583 - 592
  • [6] Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is not associated with pubertal testosterone
    Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.
    Sobraske, Katherine N. Hanson
    Samore, Theodore
    Gurven, Michael
    Gaulin, Steven J. C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2016, 159 : 174 - 174
  • [7] The influence of income and testosterone on the validity of facial width-to-height ratio as a biomarker for dominance
    Noser, Emilou
    Schoch, Jessica
    Ehlert, Ulrike
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (11):
  • [8] Automatic processing of facial width-to-height ratio
    Wang Hailing
    Chen Enguang
    Lian Yujing
    Li Jingjing
    Wang Liwei
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 55 (11) : 1745 - 1761
  • [9] Facial width-to-height ratio and celebrity endorsements
    Huh, HaengRyang
    Yi, DongSoo
    Zhu, HongYang
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 68 : 43 - 47
  • [10] Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels
    Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.
    Sobraske, Katherine N. Hanson
    Samore, Theodore
    Gurven, Michael
    Gaulin, Steven J. C.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04):