Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients

被引:14
|
作者
Hansum, Tim [1 ]
Hollemans, Eva [1 ]
Verhoef, Esther, I [1 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [2 ]
Rietbergen, John [3 ]
Osanto, Susanne [4 ]
Pelger, Rob C. M. [5 ]
van Wezel, Tom [6 ]
van der Poel, Henk [7 ]
Bekers, Elise [8 ]
Helleman, Jozien [2 ]
Remmers, Sebastiaan [2 ]
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Hosp, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[7] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; DISEASE-SPECIFIC DEATH; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; CRIBRIFORM PATTERN; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; SYSTEM; ADENOCARCINOMA; METASTASIS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41379-021-00860-4
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Individual growth patterns and cribriform architecture are increasingly considered in risk stratification and clinical decision-making in men with prostate cancer. Our objective was to establish the prognostic value of individual Gleason 5 patterns in a radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort. We reviewed 1064 RPs and recorded Grade Group (GG), pT-stage, surgical margin status, Gleason 4 and 5 growth patterns as well as intraductal carcinoma. The clinical endpoints were biochemical recurrence and post-operative distant metastasis. Gleason pattern 5 was present in 339 (31.9%) RPs, of which 47 (4.4%) presented as primary, 166 (15.6%) as secondary, and 126 (11.8%) as tertiary pattern. Single cells/cords were present in 321 (94.7%) tumors with Gleason pattern 5, solid fields in 90 (26.5%), and comedonecrosis in invasive carcinoma in 32 (9.4%) tumors. Solid fields demonstrated either a small nested morphology (n = 50, 14.7%) or medium to large solid fields (n = 61, 18.0%). Cribriform architecture was present in 568 (53.4%) RPs. Medium to large solid fields and comedonecrosis coincided with cribriform architecture in all specimens, and were not observed in cribriform-negative cases. In multivariable analysis adjusted for Prostate-Specific Antigen, pT-stage, GG, surgical margin status and lymph node metastases, cribriform architecture (Hazard Ratio (HR) 9.9; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 3.9-25.5, P < 0.001) and comedonecrosis (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.7, P = 0.01) were independent predictors for metastasis-free survival, while single cells/cords (HR 1.2; 95% CI 0.7-1.8, P = 0.55) and medium to large solid fields (HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.9-2.7, P = 0.09) were not. In conclusion, comedonecrosis in invasive carcinoma is an independent prognostic Gleason 5 pattern for metastasis-free survival after RP. These data support the current recommendations to routinely include cribriform pattern in pathology reports and indicate that comedonecrosis should also be commented on.
引用
收藏
页码:2064 / 2070
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF PERCENTAGE OF GLEASON PATTERN 4 IN GLEASON SCORE 7 PROSTATE CANCER AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Jamal, Mohsin
    Williamson, Sean R.
    Diaz-Lnsua, Mireya
    Menon, Mani
    Stricker, Hans
    Peabody, James
    Rogers, Craig
    Gupta, Nilesh
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E1039 - E1039
  • [22] Clinical Significance of Percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy
    Jamal, Mohsin
    Williamson, Sean R.
    Diaz-Insua, Mireya
    Menon, Mani
    Stricker, Hans
    Peabody, James
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Gupta, Nilesh S.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 240A - 240A
  • [23] The significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in prostate cancer
    Tavukcu, Huseyin
    Turker, Polat
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2012, 11 (02): : 168 - 172
  • [24] The prognostic significance of Gleason pattern 5 in prostate cancer patients treated with Pd-103 brachytherapy
    Mitsuyama, Hiroki
    Wallner, Kent
    Merrick, Gregory
    Virgin, Jeffrey
    Orio, Peter
    Montgomery, Bruce
    True, Lawrence D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 30 (06): : 597 - 600
  • [25] Inter-observer variability of cribriform architecture and percent Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer: relation to clinical outcome
    Margaretha A. van der Slot
    Eva Hollemans
    Michael A. den Bakker
    Robert Hoedemaeker
    Mike Kliffen
    Leo M. Budel
    Natascha N. T. Goemaere
    Geert J. L. H. van Leenders
    Virchows Archiv, 2021, 478 : 249 - 256
  • [26] Inter-observer variability of cribriform architecture and percent Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer: relation to clinical outcome
    van der Slot, Margaretha A.
    Hollemans, Eva
    den Bakker, Michael A.
    Hoedemaeker, Robert
    Kliffen, Mike
    Budel, Leo M.
    Goemaere, Natascha N. T.
    van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2021, 478 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [27] Gleason 5+4 Has Worse Oncological and Pathological Outcomes Compared with Gleason 4+5: Significance of Gleason 5 Pattern
    Lim, Sey Kiat
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Shin, Tae-Young
    Chung, Byung Ha
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Rha, Koon Ho
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (09) : 3127 - 3132
  • [28] The Impact of the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System on the Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer
    Dong, F.
    Wang, C.
    Farris, A. B.
    Wu, S.
    Lee, H.
    Olumi, A. F.
    McDougal, W. S.
    Young, R. H.
    Wu, C-L
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 200A - 201A
  • [29] The Impact of the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System on the Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer
    Dang, F.
    Wang, C.
    Farris, A. B.
    Wu, S.
    Lee, H.
    Olumi, A. F.
    McDougal, W. S.
    Young, R. H.
    Wu, C-L
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 200A - 201A
  • [30] Gleason 5+4 Has Worse Oncological and Pathological Outcomes Compared with Gleason 4+5: Significance of Gleason 5 Pattern
    Sey Kiat Lim
    Kwang Hyun Kim
    Tae-Young Shin
    Byung Ha Chung
    Sung Joon Hong
    Young Deuk Choi
    Koon Ho Rha
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 3127 - 3132