Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: An analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU

被引:81
|
作者
van Asselt, Harro [1 ]
Brewer, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Georgetown Univ, McDonough Sch Business, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
Climate policy; Carbon leakage; Competitiveness; EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME; NATIONAL ALLOCATION PLANS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.061
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The implementation of climate policies in the US and EU in light of uncertainties about future international climate policy has shifted attention to two interrelated concerns, namely competitiveness and carbon leakage. Although various policy measures are available to address these concerns there has been much discussion on a out one such measure in particular: the use of offsetting measures at the border. This article compares policy discussions in the US and the EU on how to address competitiveness and carbon leakage concerns, with a focus on the role of import-related border adjustment measures. It analyses the kinds of measures that so far have been put forward with a view to addressing competitiveness and carbon leakage; compares the approaches to the problems in the US and the EU: and provides a preliminary discussion of international cooperation on border adjustment measures. It concludes that two kinds of cooperation are needed between the EU and the US - not only cooperation through formal international negotiations, but also cooperation through international learning processes, in which the EU and the US learn from each other about design and implementation issues as they develop their respective cap-and-trade systems. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 51
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Practical obstacles and structural legal constraints in the adoption of 'defensive' policies: comparing the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the US Proposal for a Border Carbon Adjustment
    Leonelli, Giulia Claudia
    [J]. LEGAL STUDIES, 2022, : 696 - 714
  • [32] Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers' willingness to act and to support policy measures
    Tobler, Christina
    Visschers, Vivianne H. M.
    Siegrist, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 32 (03) : 197 - 207
  • [33] Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries
    Perdana, Sigit
    Vielle, Marc
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 170
  • [34] Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries
    Perdana, Sigit
    Vielle, Marc
    [J]. Energy Policy, 2022, 170
  • [35] EU policy must change to reflect the potential of gene editing for addressing climate change
    Garland, Sarah
    [J]. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 28
  • [36] Evolutionary Game Analysis of Responding to the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
    Huang, Tao
    Liu, Zhixin
    Zhao, Tian
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (02)
  • [37] EU competition policy and US antitrust: a comparative analysis
    Bartalevich, Dzmitry
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 44 (01) : 91 - 112
  • [38] Analysis of the EU policy package on climate change and renewables
    Capros, Pantelis
    Mantzos, Leonidas
    Parousos, Leonidas
    Tasios, Nikolaos
    Klaassen, Ger
    Van Lerland, Tom
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (03) : 1476 - 1485
  • [39] Addressing the emergence of pediatric vaccination concerns - Recommendations from a Canadian policy analysis
    Wilson, K
    Bara-Kat, M
    Mills, E
    Rjtvo, P
    Boon, H
    Vohra, S
    Jadad, AR
    McGeer, A
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2006, 97 (02): : 139 - 141
  • [40] Leakage from Climate Policies and Border-Tax Adjustment: Lessons from a Geographic Model of the Cement Industry
    Demailly, Damien
    Quirion, Philippe
    [J]. DESIGN OF CLIMATE POLICY, 2008, : 333 - 358