Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: An analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU

被引:81
|
作者
van Asselt, Harro [1 ]
Brewer, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Georgetown Univ, McDonough Sch Business, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
Climate policy; Carbon leakage; Competitiveness; EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME; NATIONAL ALLOCATION PLANS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.061
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The implementation of climate policies in the US and EU in light of uncertainties about future international climate policy has shifted attention to two interrelated concerns, namely competitiveness and carbon leakage. Although various policy measures are available to address these concerns there has been much discussion on a out one such measure in particular: the use of offsetting measures at the border. This article compares policy discussions in the US and the EU on how to address competitiveness and carbon leakage concerns, with a focus on the role of import-related border adjustment measures. It analyses the kinds of measures that so far have been put forward with a view to addressing competitiveness and carbon leakage; compares the approaches to the problems in the US and the EU: and provides a preliminary discussion of international cooperation on border adjustment measures. It concludes that two kinds of cooperation are needed between the EU and the US - not only cooperation through formal international negotiations, but also cooperation through international learning processes, in which the EU and the US learn from each other about design and implementation issues as they develop their respective cap-and-trade systems. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 51
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Competitiveness and Leakage Concerns and Border Carbon Adjustments
    Zhang, ZhongXiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 6 (03): : 225 - 287
  • [2] Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation?
    Monjon, Stephanie
    Quirion, Philippe
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (11) : 1957 - 1971
  • [3] The Role of Trade and Competitiveness Measures in US Climate Policy
    Fischer, Carolyn
    Fox, Alan K.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (03): : 258 - 262
  • [4] Fossil fuel supply, leakage and the effectiveness of border measures in climate policy
    Boeters, Stefan
    Bollen, Johannes
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 : S181 - S189
  • [5] Climate Policy and Border Measures: The Case of the US Aluminum Industry
    Sheldon, Ian
    McCorriston, Steve
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2017, 39 (02) : 242 - 258
  • [6] Mitigation of adverse effects on competitiveness and leakage of unilateral EU climate policy: An assessment of policy instruments
    Antimiani, Alessandro
    Costantini, Valeria
    Kuik, Onno
    Paglialunga, Elena
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 128 : 246 - 259
  • [7] Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage
    Kuik, Onno
    Hofkes, Marjan
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (04) : 1741 - 1748
  • [8] Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the Protection of the Competitiveness of EU Aluminium Producers
    Epurescu, Vlad
    [J]. RESILIENCE AND ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE THROUGH DIGITALIZATION AND BIG DATA ANALYTICS, 2021, : 48 - 58
  • [9] The relevance of process emissions for carbon leakage: A comparison of unilateral climate policy options with and without border carbon adjustment
    Bednar-Friedl, Birgit
    Schinko, Thomas
    Steininger, Karl W.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 : S168 - S180
  • [10] Addressing the concerns about carbon leakage in the implementation of carbon pricing policies: a focus on the issue of competitiveness
    Rey, Florian
    Madies, Thierry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2021, 48 (01): : 53 - 75