Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for preventing skeletal-related events in the Czech Republic

被引:17
|
作者
Cristino, Joaquim [1 ]
Finek, Jindrich [2 ]
Jandova, Petra [3 ]
Kolek, Martin [4 ]
Pasztor, Balint [4 ]
Giannopoulou, Christina [1 ]
Qian, Yi [5 ]
Brezina, Tomas [3 ]
Lothgren, Mickael [1 ]
机构
[1] Amgen Europe GmbH, Dammstr 23, CH-6301 Zug, Switzerland
[2] Pilsen Fac Hosp, Clin Oncol & Radiotherapy FN Plzni, Plzen, Czech Republic
[3] Amgen Sro, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Oaks Consulting, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Bone; Cost-effectiveness; Czech Republic; Oncology; Prostate cancer; METASTATIC-BONE-DISEASE; US MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES; POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS; ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER; SOLID TUMORS; PROSTATE-CANCER; SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION; INTRAVENOUS-INFUSION; ORAL IBANDRONATE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2017.1328423
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Aims: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the subcutaneous RANKL inhibitor, denosumab, vs the intravenous bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with prostate cancer, breast cancer, and other solid tumors (OST) in the Czech Republic. Materials and methods: A lifetime Markov model was developed to compare the effects of denosumab and zoledronic acid on costs (including drug costs and administration, patient management, SREs, and adverse events), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from a national payer perspective. Different discount rates, time horizons, SRE rates, distributions, and nature (asymptomatic vs all SREs), and the inclusion of treatment discontinuation were considered in scenario analyses. The robustness of the model was tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Across tumor types, denosumab was associated with fewer SREs, improved QALYs, and higher total costs over a lifetime. The incremental cost per QALY gained for denosumab vs zoledronic acid was 382,673 CZK for prostate cancer, 408,450 CZK for breast cancer, and 608,133 CZK for OST. Incremental costs per SRE avoided for the same tumor type were 54,007 CZK, 51,765 CZK, and 94,426 CZK, respectively. In scenario analyses, the results remained similar to baseline, when different discount rates and time horizons were considered. At a non-official willingness-to-pay threshold of 1.2 million CZK, the probabilities of denosumab being cost-effective vs zoledronic acid were 0.64, 0.67, and 0.49 for prostate cancer, breast cancer, and OST, respectively. Limitations: The SRE rates used were obtained from clinical trials; studies suggest rates may be higher in clinical practice. Additional evidence on real-world SRE rates could further improve the accuracy of the modeling. Conclusions: Compared with zoledronic acid, denosumab provides a cost-effective treatment option for the prevention of SREs in patients with prostate cancer, breast cancer, and OST in the Czech Republic.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 812
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prevention of Skeletal-Related Events With Denosumab or Zoledronic Acid - Combined Analysis From 3 Registrational Trials
    Lipton, A.
    Fizazi, K.
    Stopeck, A. T.
    Henry, D. H.
    Brown, J. E.
    Saad, F.
    Yardley, D.
    Maroto, P.
    Ke, C.
    Jun, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S240 - S240
  • [22] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Denosumab in the Prevention of Skeletal-Related Events Among Patients With Breast Cancer With Bone Metastasis in India
    Wadhwa, Raina
    Gupta, Nidhi
    Dixit, Jyoti
    Malhotra, Pankaj
    Lakshmi, P. V. M.
    Prinja, Shankar
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10
  • [23] Comparing cost-effectiveness analyses of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases
    Koo, Kaitlin
    Lam, Kinsey
    Mittmann, Nicole
    Konski, Andre
    Dennis, Kristopher
    Zeng, Liang
    Lam, Henry
    Chow, Edward
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2013, 21 (06) : 1785 - 1791
  • [24] Comparing cost-effectiveness analyses of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases
    Kaitlin Koo
    Kinsey Lam
    Nicole Mittmann
    Andre Konski
    Kristopher Dennis
    Liang Zeng
    Henry Lam
    Edward Chow
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013, 21 : 1785 - 1791
  • [25] Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in prevention of skeletal-related events in vulnerable cancer patients:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    CHEN Chao-yang
    LI Ruo-ming
    YANG Ting
    MA Ling-yun
    ZHOU Shuang
    LI Min
    ZHOU Ying
    CUI Yi-min
    中国药理学与毒理学杂志, 2019, (10) : 879 - 880
  • [26] COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF DENOSUMAB VERSUS ZOLEDRONIC ACID (ZA) FOR PREVENTION OF SKELETAL-RELATED EVENTS (SRES): A CRITICAL APRAISAL OF THREE PIVOTAL TRIALS
    Strite, S.
    Stuart, M. E.
    Beckman, V
    Oehrling, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A192 - A193
  • [27] Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in the Prevention of Skeletal-related Events in Vulnerable Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
    Chen, Chaoyang
    Li, Ruoming
    Yang, Ting
    Ma, Lingyun
    Zhou, Shuang
    Li, Min
    Zhou, Ying
    Cui, Yimin
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 42 (08) : 1494 - +
  • [28] COMPARATIVE BUDGET IMPACT OF FORMULARY INCLUSION OF ZOLEDRONIC ACID AND DENOSUMAB FOR PREVENTION OF SKELETAL-RELATED EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH BONE METASTASES
    Bell, M. J.
    Miller, J. D.
    Namjoshi, M.
    Russell, M. W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A159 - A159
  • [29] COST-EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON OF DENOSUMAB AND ZOLEDRONIC ACID IN THE TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS
    Ding, Y.
    Hay, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A47 - A47
  • [30] Lifetime cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic for prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients (pts) with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases (BM): United States managed care perspective
    Rader, Michael E.
    Danese, Mark
    Cong, Ze
    Halperin, Marc
    Qian, Yi
    Goessl, Carsten Dietrich
    Chung, Karen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)