The effect of load distribution within military load carriage systems on the kinetics of human gait

被引:77
|
作者
Birrell, Stewart A. [1 ]
Haslam, Roger A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ, Sch Engn & Design, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[2] Univ Loughborough, Dept Human Sci, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
关键词
Load carriage; Load distribution; Kinetics; Military; GROUND REACTION FORCES; WALKING; DESIGNS; POSTURE; PLANE; MODES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Military personnel carry their equipment in load carriage systems (LCS) which consists of webbing and a Bergen (aka backpack). In scientific terms it is most efficient to carry load as close to the body's centre of mass (CoM) as possible, this has been shown extensively with physiological studies. However, less is known regarding the kinetic effects of load distribution. Twelve experienced load carriers carried four different loads (8, 16, 24 and 32 kg) in three LCS (backpack, standard and AirMesh). The three LCS represented a gradual shift to a more even load distribution around the CoM. Results from the study suggest that shifting the CoM posteriorly by carrying load solely in a backpack significantly reduced the force produced at toe-off, whilst also decreasing stance time at the heavier loads. Conversely, distributing load evenly on the trunk significantly decreased the maximum braking force by 10%. No other interactions between LCS and kinetic parameters were observed. Despite this important findings were established, in particular the effect of heavy load carriage on maximum braking force. Although the total load carried is the major cause of changes to gait patterns, the scientific testing of, and development of, future LCS can modify these risks. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 590
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A kinematic comparison of gait with a backpack versus a trolley for load carriage in children
    Orantes-Gonzalez, E.
    Heredia-Jimenez, J.
    Robinson, M. A.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2019, 80 : 28 - 34
  • [42] Gait Variability During Load Carriage In Simulated Leg Length Discrepancy
    Atikah, N. N.
    Salleh, A. F.
    Basaruddin, K. S.
    Som, M. H. Mat
    Salim, M. S.
    Sakeran, H.
    [J]. GREEN DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE: ADVANCED AND EMERGING APPLICATIONS, 2018, 2030
  • [43] Uncontrolled manifold analysis of gait variability: Effects of load carriage and fatigue
    Qu, Xingda
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2012, 36 (02) : 325 - 329
  • [44] How Different Load Carriage Scenarios Impact the Gait in Police Officers
    Kasovic, Mario
    Bilobrk, Mate
    Sladin, Damir
    Stefan, Andro
    Stefan, Lovro
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [45] Impact of work boots and load carriage on the gait of oil rig workers
    Tian, Miao
    Park, Huiju
    Koo, Heekwang
    Xu, Qinwen
    Li, Jun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2017, 23 (01) : 118 - 126
  • [46] Changes in postural sway and gait characteristics as a consequence of anterior load carriage
    Roberts, Matthew
    Talbot, Christopher
    Kay, Anthony
    Price, Michael
    Hill, Mathew
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2018, 66 : 139 - 145
  • [47] The effect of military load carriage on 3-D lower limb kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters
    Birrell, Stewart A.
    Haslam, Roger A.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2009, 52 (10) : 1298 - 1304
  • [48] Effect of Load Carriage on Upper Limb Performance
    Hadid, Amir
    Katz, Inbar
    Haker, Tal
    Zeilig, Gabi
    Defrin, Ruth
    Epstein, Yoram
    Gefen, Amit
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 1006 - 1014
  • [49] Effect of Load Carriage on the Backpack Vibration System
    Rahman, Sharifah Alwiah Abdul
    Rambely, Azmin Sham
    Ahmad, Rokiah Rozita
    [J]. TRENDS IN AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH, 2012, 165 : 295 - +
  • [50] Effect of Load Carriage on Lumbar Spine Kinematics
    Rodriguez-Soto, Ana E.
    Jaworski, Rebecca
    Jensen, Andrew
    Niederberger, Brenda
    Hargens, Alan R.
    Frank, Lawrence R.
    Kelly, Karen R.
    Ward, Samuel R.
    [J]. SPINE, 2013, 38 (13) : E783 - E791