Positive Selection Differs between Protein Secondary Structure Elements in Drosophila

被引:29
|
作者
Ridout, Kate E. [1 ]
Dixon, Christopher J. [1 ]
Filatov, Dmitry A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Plant Sci, Oxford, England
来源
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
positive selection; protein secondary structure; dN/dS ratio; Drosophila; NUCLEOTIDE SUBSTITUTION RATES; MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; AMINO-ACID REPLACEMENTS; ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; CODON-SUBSTITUTION; CODING SEQUENCES; BETA-TURNS; PREDICTION; ACCURACY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1093/gbe/evq008
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Different protein secondary structure elements have different physicochemical properties and roles in the protein, which may determine their evolutionary flexibility. However, it is not clear to what extent protein structure affects the way Darwinian selection acts at the amino acid level. Using phylogeny-based likelihood tests for positive selection, we have examined the relationship between protein secondary structure and selection across six species of Drosophila. We find that amino acids that form disordered regions, such as random coils, are far more likely to be under positive selection than expected from their proportion in the proteins, and residues in helices and beta-structures are subject to less positive selection than predicted. In addition, it appears that sites undergoing positive selection are more likely than expected to occur close to one another in the protein sequence. Finally, on a genome-wide scale, we have determined that positively selected sites are found more frequently toward the gene ends. Our results demonstrate that protein structures with a greater degree of organization and strong hydrophobicity, represented here as helices and beta-structures, are less tolerant to molecular adaptation than disordered, hydrophilic regions, across a diverse set of proteins.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 179
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Positive and Purifying Selection on the Drosophila Y Chromosome
    Singh, Nadia D.
    Koerich, Leonardo B.
    Carvalho, Antonio Bernardo
    Clark, Andrew G.
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 31 (10) : 2612 - 2623
  • [22] On the Relation Between the Predicted Secondary Structure and the Protein Size
    Lukasz Kurgan
    [J]. The Protein Journal, 2008, 27 : 234 - 239
  • [23] The relation between translation speed and protein secondary structure
    Li, XQ
    Luo, LF
    Liu, CQ
    [J]. ACTA BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA SINICA, 2003, 35 (02) : 193 - 196
  • [24] On the relation between the predicted secondary structure and the protein size
    Kurgan, Lukasz
    [J]. PROTEIN JOURNAL, 2008, 27 (04): : 234 - 239
  • [25] Study on relationship between protein sequence pattern and protein secondary structure
    Li, Minghui
    Lin, Lei
    Wang, Xiaolong
    Dong, Qiwen
    Liu, Tao
    [J]. 2005 27TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2005, : 4751 - 4754
  • [26] THE GRADUATION OF SECONDARY STRUCTURE ELEMENTS
    THOMAS, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS, 1994, 12 (02): : 146 - 152
  • [27] Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure Using Feature Selection and Analysis Approach
    Feng, Yonge
    Lin, Hao
    Luo, Liaofu
    [J]. ACTA BIOTHEORETICA, 2014, 62 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [28] Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure Using Feature Selection and Analysis Approach
    Yonge Feng
    Hao Lin
    Liaofu Luo
    [J]. Acta Biotheoretica, 2014, 62 : 1 - 14
  • [29] Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure With Clonal Selection Algorithm and Multilayer Perceptron
    Yavuz, Burcu Carkli
    Yurtay, Nlufer
    Ozkan, Ozhan
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 45256 - 45261
  • [30] Positive selection drives the evolution of the Acp29AB accessory gland protein in Drosophila
    Aguadé, M
    [J]. GENETICS, 1999, 152 (02) : 543 - 551