Prerequisites for implementing cardiovascular absolute risk assessment in general practice: a qualitative study of Australian general practitioners' and patients' views

被引:9
|
作者
Wan, Qing [1 ]
Harris, Mark F. [1 ]
Zwar, Nicholas [2 ]
Vagholkar, Sanjyot [3 ]
Campbell, Terry [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Ctr Primary Hlth Care & Equ, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Fairfield Hosp, Gen Practice Unit, Fairfield, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New S Wales, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
cardiovascular absolute risk; general practitioners; patient identification; risk assessment; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; PRIMARY-CARE; PREVENTION; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01170.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although recommended in clinical practice guidelines, cardiovascular absolute risk (CVAR) assessment is still used infrequently in Australian general practice. One reason is the lack of an implementation strategy. Given the lack of published reports on the implementation of CVAR worldwide, the aim of this study was to explore the views of general practitioners (GPs) and patients on prerequisites for successfully implementing CVAR assessment in general practice. Methods Multiple data involving GPs and patients were collected using focus groups (FGs) in three divisions of General Practice in Sydney between 2005 and 2006. Both GPs' and patients' opinions were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Twenty-two GPs participated in three GP FGs and 26 patients in three patient FGs. Many GPs thought that an initial cardiovascular risk screening could start from 40 years old while some patients thought it should start even younger. Targeting patients with known risk factors was supported by most GPs although some also stressed the importance of reaching those of unknown risk. For new patients or patients presenting for other problems, another visit for CVAR risk assessment and discussion was preferred by most GPs. A strong GP-patient relationship, common ground on priorities between GPs and their patients, patient awareness of cardiovascular risk and motivation were seen as important by both GPs and patients to the implementation of CVAR assessment. Conclusions Addressing the appropriate selection of patients and time for implementing CVAR assessment requires a consideration of multiple factors. GPs see it as a process that may need to be staged over more than one consultation and requiring appropriate strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 584
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] General Practitioners Views of Implementing a Stratified Treatment Approach for Low Back Pain in Germany: A Qualitative Study
    Karstens, Sven
    Joos, Stefanie
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Krug, Katja
    Szecsenyi, Joachim
    Steinhaeuser, Jost
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [32] CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTOR MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIAN GENERAL PRACTICE
    Heeley, E. L.
    Peiris, D.
    Weekes, A.
    Morgan, C.
    Cass, A.
    Anderson, C.
    Patel, A.
    Chalmers, J.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 27 : S32 - S32
  • [33] Cardiovascular risk factor management in Australian general practice
    Heeley, E.
    Peiris, D.
    Weekes, A.
    Morgan, C.
    Cass, A.
    Anderson, C.
    Patel, A.
    Chalmers, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 : 160 - 161
  • [34] CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTOR MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIAN GENERAL PRACTICE
    Heeley, E.
    Peiris, D.
    Weekes, A.
    Morgan, C.
    Cass, A.
    Anderson, C.
    Patel, A.
    Chalmers, J.
    HYPERTENSION, 2009, 53 (06) : 1107 - 1108
  • [35] The views of New Zealand general practitioners and patients on a proposed risk assessment and communication tool: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory
    Leitch, Sharon
    Smith, Alesha
    Crengle, Sue
    Stokes, Tim
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [36] Process Evaluation of an eHealth Intervention Implemented into General Practice: General Practitioners' and Patients' Views
    Poppe, Louise
    Plaete, Jolien
    Huys, Nele
    Verloigne, Maite
    Deveugele, Myriam
    De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
    Crombez, Geert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (07)
  • [37] General practitioners' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practice: a qualitative interview study
    Hurley, Eoin
    Walsh, Elaine
    Foley, Tony
    Heinrich, Clara H.
    Byrne, Stephen
    Dalton, Kieran
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2023, 40 (02) : 377 - 386
  • [38] General practitioners' views and experiences in caring for patients after sepsis: a qualitative interview study
    Gehrke-Beck, Sabine
    Gensichen, Jochen
    Turner, Katrina M.
    Heintze, Christoph
    Schmidt, Konrad F. R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [39] General practitioners' views on reattribution for patients with medically unexplained symptoms: a questionnaire and qualitative study
    Christopher Dowrick
    Linda Gask
    John G Hughes
    Huw Charles-Jones
    Judith A Hogg
    Sarah Peters
    Peter Salmon
    Anne R Rogers
    Richard K Morriss
    BMC Family Practice, 9
  • [40] General practitioners' views on reattribution for patients with medically unexplained symptoms: a questionnaire and qualitative study
    Dowrick, Christopher
    Gask, Linda
    Hughes, John G.
    Charles-Jones, Huw
    Hogg, Judith A.
    Peters, Sarah
    Salmon, Peter
    Rogers, Anne R.
    Morriss, Richard K.
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 9 (1)