Prerequisites for implementing cardiovascular absolute risk assessment in general practice: a qualitative study of Australian general practitioners' and patients' views

被引:9
|
作者
Wan, Qing [1 ]
Harris, Mark F. [1 ]
Zwar, Nicholas [2 ]
Vagholkar, Sanjyot [3 ]
Campbell, Terry [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Ctr Primary Hlth Care & Equ, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Fairfield Hosp, Gen Practice Unit, Fairfield, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New S Wales, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
cardiovascular absolute risk; general practitioners; patient identification; risk assessment; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; PRIMARY-CARE; PREVENTION; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01170.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although recommended in clinical practice guidelines, cardiovascular absolute risk (CVAR) assessment is still used infrequently in Australian general practice. One reason is the lack of an implementation strategy. Given the lack of published reports on the implementation of CVAR worldwide, the aim of this study was to explore the views of general practitioners (GPs) and patients on prerequisites for successfully implementing CVAR assessment in general practice. Methods Multiple data involving GPs and patients were collected using focus groups (FGs) in three divisions of General Practice in Sydney between 2005 and 2006. Both GPs' and patients' opinions were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Twenty-two GPs participated in three GP FGs and 26 patients in three patient FGs. Many GPs thought that an initial cardiovascular risk screening could start from 40 years old while some patients thought it should start even younger. Targeting patients with known risk factors was supported by most GPs although some also stressed the importance of reaching those of unknown risk. For new patients or patients presenting for other problems, another visit for CVAR risk assessment and discussion was preferred by most GPs. A strong GP-patient relationship, common ground on priorities between GPs and their patients, patient awareness of cardiovascular risk and motivation were seen as important by both GPs and patients to the implementation of CVAR assessment. Conclusions Addressing the appropriate selection of patients and time for implementing CVAR assessment requires a consideration of multiple factors. GPs see it as a process that may need to be staged over more than one consultation and requiring appropriate strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 584
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experience in implementation of cardiovascular absolute risk assessment and management in Australian general practice
    Wan, Q.
    Harris, M.
    Zwar, N.
    Vagholkar, S.
    Kemp, L.
    Campbell, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 64 (08) : 1166 - 1167
  • [2] Cardiovascular risk assessment in Australian general practice
    Gupta, Ruchi
    Stocks, Nigel P.
    Broadbent, Jessica
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2009, 38 (05) : 364 - 368
  • [3] Sustaining cardiovascular absolute risk management in Australian general practice
    Vaidya, Ruhie
    Pandya, Keval V.
    Denney-Wilson, Elizabeth
    Harris, Mark
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2012, 18 (04) : 304 - 307
  • [4] Absolute cardiovascular risk assessment by Australian early-career general practitioners: a cross-sectional study
    Morgan, Toby
    Ralston, Anna
    Davey, Andrew
    Holliday, Elizabeth G.
    Nelson, Mark
    Fielding, Alison
    van Driel, Mieke
    Tapley, Amanda
    Moad, Dominica
    Ball, Jean
    Presser, Jennifer
    Spike, Neil
    Magin, Parker
    FAMILY MEDICINE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [5] General practitioners' use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies: a qualitative study
    Bonner, Carissa
    Jansen, Jesse
    McKinn, Shannon
    Irwig, Les
    Doust, Jenny
    Glasziou, Paul
    Hayen, Andrew
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2013, 199 (07) : 485 - 489
  • [6] General practitioners' assessment of risk of violence in their practice: results from a qualitative study
    Magin, Parker
    Adams, Jon
    Joy, Elyssa
    Ireland, Malcolm
    Heaney, Susan
    Darab, Sandra
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 14 (03) : 385 - 390
  • [7] General practitioners' views on genomics, practice and education A qualitative interview study
    Cusack, Marie Brigitte
    Hickerton, Chriselle
    Nisselle, Amy
    McClaren, Belinda
    Terrill, Bronwyn
    Gaff, Clara
    Dunlop, Kate
    Metcalfe, Sylvia
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 50 (10) : 747 - 752
  • [8] Implementing a QCancer risk tool into general practice consultations: an exploratory study using simulated consultations with Australian general practitioners
    P P-C Chiang
    D Glance
    J Walker
    F M Walter
    J D Emery
    British Journal of Cancer, 2015, 112 : S77 - S83
  • [9] Implementing a QCancer risk tool into general practice consultations: an exploratory study using simulated consultations with Australian general practitioners
    Chiang, P. P-C
    Glance, D.
    Walker, J.
    Walter, F. M.
    Emery, J. D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 : S77 - S83
  • [10] Implementing a QCancer® risk tool into General practice consultations: an exploratory study using simulated consultations with Australian General Practitioners
    Emery, Jon
    Glance, David
    Walker, Jennifer
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Chiang, Peggy Pei-Chia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2015, 24 : 50 - 51