DL-Lite Contraction and Revision

被引:11
|
作者
Zhuang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Wang, Zhe [2 ]
Wang, Kewen [2 ]
Qi, Guilin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Inst Integrated & Intelligent Syst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Informat & Commun Technol, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Southeast Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Novel Software Technol, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
INSTANCE-LEVEL; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1613/jair.5050
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Two essential tasks in managing description logic knowledge bases are eliminating problematic axioms and incorporating newly formed ones. Such elimination and incorporation are formalised as the operations of contraction and revision in belief change. In this paper, we deal with contraction and revision for the DL-Lite family through a model-theoretic approach. Standard description logic semantics yields an in finite number of models for DL-Lite knowledge bases, thus it is difficult to develop algorithms for contraction and revision that involve DL models. The key to our approach is the introduction of an alternative semantics called type semantics which can replace the standard semantics in characterising the standard inference tasks of DL-Lite. Type semantics has several advantages over the standard one. It is more succinct and importantly, with a finite signature, the semantics always yields a finite number of models. We then de fine model-based contraction and revision functions for DL-Lite knowledge bases under type semantics and provide representation theorems for them. Finally, the finiteness and succinctness of type semantics allow us to develop tractable algorithms for instantiating the functions.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 378
页数:50
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cardinality Queries over DL-Lite Ontologies
    Bienvenu, Meghyn
    Maniere, Quentin
    Thomazo, Michael
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2021, 2021, : 1801 - 1807
  • [32] Explanation in the DL-Lite Family of Description Logics
    Borgida, Alexander
    Calvanese, Diego
    Rodriguez-Muro, Mariano
    ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS: OTM 2008, PT II, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5332 : 1440 - +
  • [33] Min-based possibilistic DL-Lite
    Benferhat, Salem
    Bouraoui, Zied
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2017, 27 (01) : 261 - 297
  • [34] Scalable Reasoning by Abstraction Beyond DL-Lite
    Glimm, Birte
    Kazakov, Yevgeny
    Trung-Kien Tran
    WEB REASONING AND RULE SYSTEMS, (RR 2016), 2016, 9898 : 77 - 93
  • [35] Intensional and Extensional Views in DL-Lite Ontologies
    Console, Marco
    De Giacomo, Giuseppe
    Lenzerini, Maurizio
    Namici, Manuel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2021, 2021, : 1822 - 1828
  • [36] Instance-Driven Ontology Evolution in DL-Lite
    Wang, Zhe
    Wang, Kewen
    Zhuang, Zhiqiang
    Qi, Guilin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, : 1656 - 1662
  • [37] Query Answering in Fuzzy DL-Lite with Graded Axioms
    Pasi, Gabriella
    Penaloza, Rafael
    RULES AND REASONING, RULEML+RR 2020, 2020, 12173 : 39 - 53
  • [38] An approach to generating arguments over DL-Lite ontologies
    1600, Slovak Academy of Sciences (32):
  • [39] Capturing Instance Level Ontology Evolution for DL-Lite
    Kharlamov, Evgeny
    Zheleznyakov, Dmitriy
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2011, PT I, 2011, 7031 : 321 - 337
  • [40] Boolean Role Inclusions in DL-Lite With andWithout Time
    Kontchakov, Roman
    Ryzhikov, Vladislav
    Wolter, Frank
    Zakharyaschev, Michael
    KR2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRINCIPLES OF KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING, 2020, : 582 - 591