Sociodemographic Characteristics of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use and Reasons for Nonuse Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men from Three US Cities

被引:23
|
作者
Kota, Krishna Kiran [1 ,2 ]
Mansergh, Gordon [1 ]
Stephenson, Rob [3 ,4 ]
Hirshfield, Sabina [5 ]
Sullivan, Patrick [6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div HIV AIDS Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Ctr Sexual & Hlth Dispar, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] SUNY Downstate Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Med, Brooklyn, NY USA
[6] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
MSM; PrEP nonuse; HIV; current PrEP users; previous PrEP users; DISORDERS IDENTIFICATION TEST; UNITED-STATES; DRUG-USE; PREP UPTAKE; BLACK-MEN; ALCOHOL; ADHERENCE; BARRIERS; FACILITATORS; WILLINGNESS;
D O I
10.1089/apc.2020.0261
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a preventive medication that could reduce new infections among men who have sex with men (MSM). There are limited data on differing reasons for PrEP nonuse by condomless anal sex (CAS). We examined demographic and behavioral variables associated with PrEP use and reasons for PrEP nonuse by CAS. Data are from the M-cubed Study, collected in a 2018 baseline assessment of MSM (n = 798) in Atlanta, Detroit, and New York City. Participants reported current PrEP use (31%), previous use (8%), and never use (61%). MSM reporting CAS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.60, confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.73-3.91), age 18-29 (aOR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.26-3.52), 30-39 (aOR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.25-3.59), with a college degree (aOR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.20-3.21), or postgraduate education (aOR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.51-4.40) had greater odds of current (vs. never) use; uninsured (aOR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.16-0.57) men had lower odds of current (vs. never) use. For never use, more MSM who reported CAS (vs. did not) endorsed the following reasons (p's < 0.05): Insurance wouldn't cover PrEP (20% vs. 12%), Didn't know where to get it (33% vs. 24%) and fewer reported Didn't need PrEP (23% vs. 39%) and Started a committed relationship (7% vs. 25%). For discontinuation, more MSM who reported CAS (vs. did not) endorsed Worry about the safety of PrEP (19% vs. 3%). Efforts are needed to enhance PrEP as an option among older, less educated, and uninsured MSM. These findings may inform how providers can facilitate PrEP use by messaging on access and safety for MSM who reported CAS.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 166
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men Prescribed Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Baltimore City, Maryland
    Schumacher, Christina
    Wu, Linxuan
    Chandran, Aruna
    Fields, Errol
    Price, Ashley
    Greenbaum, Adena
    Jennings, Jacky M.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (10) : 2637 - 2644
  • [42] Intimate Partner Violence and Preferences for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Modes of Delivery Among A Sample of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men
    Stephenson, Rob
    Rogers, Erin
    Mansergh, Gordon
    Hirshfield, Sabina
    Sullivan, Patrick
    AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2022, 26 (07) : 2425 - 2434
  • [43] Intimate Partner Violence and Preferences for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Modes of Delivery Among A Sample of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men
    Rob Stephenson
    Erin Rogers
    Gordon Mansergh
    Sabina Hirshfield
    Patrick Sullivan
    AIDS and Behavior, 2022, 26 : 2425 - 2434
  • [44] Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who have Sex with Men: Dual Motivational Model of Intention to Use Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
    Yerina S. Ranjit
    Alex Dubov
    Maxim Polonsky
    Liana Fraenkel
    Adedotun Ogunbajo
    Kenneth Mayer
    Frederick L. Altice
    AIDS and Behavior, 2019, 23 : 534 - 543
  • [45] Knowledge, interest, and anticipated barriers of pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and adherence among gay, bisexual, and men who have sex with men who are incarcerated
    Brinkley-Rubinstein, Lauren
    Peterson, Meghan
    Arnold, Trisha
    Nunn, Amy S.
    Beckwith, Curt G.
    Castonguay, Breana
    Junious, Eric
    Lewis, Chantal
    Chan, Philip A.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [46] Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who have Sex with Men: Dual Motivational Model of Intention to Use Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
    Ranjit, Yerina S.
    Dubov, Alex
    Polonsky, Maxim
    Fraenkel, Liana
    Ogunbajo, Adedotun
    Mayer, Kenneth
    Altice, Frederick L.
    AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2019, 23 (02) : 534 - 543
  • [47] Willingness to Accept HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Chinese Men Who Have Sex with Men
    Zhou, Feng
    Gao, Lei
    Li, Shuming
    Li, Dongliang
    Zhang, Lifen
    Fan, Wensheng
    Yang, Xueying
    Yu, Mingrun
    Xiao, Dong
    Yan, Li
    Zhang, Zheng
    Shi, Wei
    Luo, Fengji
    Ruan, Yuhua
    Jin, Qi
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (03):
  • [48] Willingness to Take, Use of, and Indications for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men-20 US Cities, 2014
    Hoots, Brooke E.
    Finlayson, Teresa
    Nerlander, Lina
    Paz-Bailey, Gabriela
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 63 (05) : 672 - 677
  • [49] Challenges for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States
    Mansergh, Gordon
    Koblin, Beryl A.
    Sullivan, Patrick S.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (08)
  • [50] Perceptions of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Young, Black Men Who Have Sex with Men
    Elopre, Latesha
    McDavid, Chastity
    Brown, Ashley
    Shurbaji, Sally
    Mugavero, Michael J.
    Turan, Janet M.
    AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2018, 32 (12) : 511 - 518