IMPACT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE ECOLOGY IN THE REGIONS OF LITHUANIA

被引:9
|
作者
Ginevicius, Romualdas [1 ]
Gedvilaite, Dainora [1 ]
Stasiukynas, Andrius [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Business Management, Dept Econ Engn, Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT | 2018年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
Sustainable development of regions; impact of economic development on the ecology; multicriteria assessment methods; correlation analysis; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; EUROPE;
D O I
10.15240/tul/001/2018-2-002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
All three components of sustainable development (SD) - economic, social and ecological are closely interrelated and have both direct and reverse impacts. To better understand the SD phenomenon and to manage it purposefully, we need to perform two essential tasks: first, a quantitative analysis of the status of the components; and second, a quantitative assessment of their impact on one another. Both economic development and ecological development are complex processes that manifest themselves in many aspects; thus, the quantitative assessment of the condition of these processes is based on multi-criteria methods. The article analyses the impact of economic development of the regions of the state on the ecological development as an essential component thereof. The latter statement represents the purpose of the study. The set of economic development indices is formed based on the possibility to obtain the required statistical information. Only those indices that reflect irreversible resources: water, air and land resources - are included in the system of economic development indices. Following the assessment of the condition of economic development and of the ecological development, the interrelation between the economic development and the ecological development shall be analysed based on correlation and regression analysis. It has been determined that economic development in the regions of Lithuania has a negative impact on the ecological development in those regions (r = 0.82). The components of economic development reflect only 57% of its impact on the ecology; whereas construction (r = 0.71) and industry (r = 0.47) have the biggest negative impact.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 37
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic Development and Environmental Impact Disparities among Russia's Regions
    Glazyrina, I.
    Zabrlina, I.
    Klevakina, E.
    ZHURNAL NOVAYA EKONOMICHESKAYA ASSOTSIATSIYA-JOURNAL OF THE NEW ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2010, (07): : 70 - 88
  • [22] National heterogeneity in the Russian regions: Assessment, change, impact on economic development
    Bufetova, Anna N.
    Kolomaki, Evgeniya A.
    VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2021, (01): : 120 - 142
  • [23] The Role of Creative Industries in Economic Development of Lithuania and Latvia
    Daubaraite, Ugne
    Startiene, Grazina
    COUNTRY EXPERIENCES IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2017, 5 : 91 - 103
  • [24] PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES OF SMALL AND MEDIUM BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT IN REGIONS OF LITHUANIA
    Vijeikis, Juozas
    Balezentis, Alvydas
    MANAGEMENT THEORY AND STUDIES FOR RURAL BUSINESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 20 : 163 - 172
  • [25] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN LITHUANIA
    Urbsiene, Laima
    Sendriy, Oleksandra
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2014, 13 (3C): : 446 - 467
  • [26] BIODIVERSITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN ROAD DEVELOPMENT IN LITHUANIA
    Vaiskunaite, Rasa
    Mierauskas, Pranas
    Spakauskas, Valdas
    TRANSPORT, 2012, 27 (02) : 187 - 195
  • [27] THE IMPACT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR BUSINESS INNOVATIONS IN LITHUANIA
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2014, 16 (37) : 965 - 979
  • [28] ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF EASTERN REGIONS
    WADEKIN, KE
    OSTEUROPA, 1966, 16 (7-8): : 508 - 522
  • [29] SOCIAL-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ECOLOGY
    KONDRATYEV, KY
    VESTNIK AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1989, (08) : 134 - 136
  • [30] ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT AND ECOLOGY IN USSR
    LIZZADRI, L
    PONTE-RIVISTA MENSILE DI POLITICA E LETTERATURA, 1978, 34 (02): : 169 - 176