The Effect of Freezing Twice during Assisted Reproductive Technology on Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Pan, Ye [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Wu, Richao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Wang, Ze [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Li, Xiufang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gao, Shanshan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Shi, Yuhua [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Cheeloo Coll Med, Ctr Reprod Med, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Key Lab Reprod Endocrinol Minist Educ, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Key Lab Reprod Med, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Prov Clin Res Ctr Reprod Hlth, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Univ, Natl Res Ctr Assisted Reprod Technol & Reprod Gen, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[6] Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; FROZEN EMBRYO-TRANSFER; OOCYTE VITRIFICATION; GENE-EXPRESSION; SPERM INJECTION; BABIES BORN; FRESH; CRYOPRESERVATION; DNA; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1155/2022/5623462
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of this paper was to investigate whether two freeze-thaw cycles before embryo transfer may affect perinatal and neonatal outcomes. Materials and Methods. A total of 8,028 frozen-thawed embryo transfer patients who became pregnant between March 2013 and September 2019 were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the oocyte cryopreservation (OC) group (N=96) and the control group (N=7932). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the baseline characteristics of the two groups at a proportion of 1 : 4. There were 96 patients in the OC group and 369 patients in the control group after PSM. The pregnancy-related complications and neonatal conditions after delivery of the two groups were compared. Results. The OC group had a higher stillbirth rate (3.1% vs. 0.3%, P=0.029) than the control group after PSM. Moreover, a slightly higher pregnancy defect rate was found in the OC group. There was no significant difference in the rates of diabetes mellitus, hypertension during pregnancy, cesarean section, multiple births, low birth weight (LBW), or premature birth defects between the two groups. Conclusions. Our findings demonstrate that performing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) with cryopreserved oocytes was associated with a higher rate of stillbirth than FET with fresh oocytes. The incidences of diabetes, gestational hypertension, cesarean section, multiple births, LBW, premature birth, and birth defects of the two groups were not significantly different.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Very Advanced Maternal Age on Early Neonatal Outcomes After Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Shamshirsaz, Amir
    Moaddab, Amirhossein
    Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh
    Arian, Sara
    Ramin, Susan
    Heidari-Bateni, Zhoobin
    Erfani, Hadi
    Fox, Karin
    Clark, Steven
    Belfort, Michael
    Dildy, Gary
    McCullough, Laurence
    Chervenak, Frank
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 24 : 262A - 263A
  • [22] Re: The Impact of Using Donor Sperm in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles on Perinatal Outcomes
    Niederberger, Craig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (02): : 196 - 196
  • [23] Assisted reproductive technology and perinatal outcomes: conventional versus discordant-sibling design
    Dhalwani, Nafeesa N.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Zhang, Yujia
    McKane, Patricia
    Bailey, Marie A.
    Hood, Maria-Elena
    Tata, Laila J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (03) : 710 - +
  • [24] Assisted Reproductive Technology, Multiple Births, and Perinatal Outcomes in Taiwan from 2001 to 2020
    Yu, Tsung
    Chiu, Li-Hsien
    Chen, Ta-Sheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 273
  • [25] Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology
    Martin, Angela S.
    Chang, Jeani
    Zhang, Yujia
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    McKane, Patricia
    Bernson, Dana
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (04) : 954 - 960
  • [26] Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology
    Van Voorhis, B
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (01): : 183 - 200
  • [27] Obesity and assisted reproductive technology outcomes
    Bellver, Jose
    Busso, Cristiano
    Pellicer, Antonio
    Remohí, José
    Simón, Carlos
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2006, 12 (05) : 562 - 568
  • [28] Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcomes
    Helmerhorst, F. M.
    Keirse, M. J. N. C.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (08) : 1329 - 1329
  • [29] Assisted Reproductive Technology and Developmental Outcomes
    Kirby, Russell S.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2018, 142 (06)
  • [30] Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnancies Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies
    Sljivancanin, Tamara
    Kontic-Vucinic, Olivera
    [J]. SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2015, 143 (9-10) : 632 - 638