Deflazacort dose optimization and safety evaluation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DOSE): A randomized, double-blind non-inferiority trial

被引:2
|
作者
Reddy, Chaithanya [1 ]
Patil, Amol N. [2 ]
Suthar, Renu [1 ,4 ]
Sankhyan, Naveen [1 ]
Sirari, Titiksha [1 ]
Kumar, Ankit [2 ]
Bhattacharjee, Samiksha [2 ]
Saxena, Somya [3 ]
Saini, Arushi G. [1 ]
Sahu, Jitendra K. [1 ]
机构
[1] PGIMER, Dept Pediat, Pediat Neurol Unit, Adv Pediat Ctr, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] PGIMER, Dept Pharmacol, Chandigarh 160012, India
[3] PGIMER, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Chandigarh 160012, India
[4] PGIMER, Dept Pediat, Pediat Neurol Unit, Adv Pediat Ctr, Chandigarh 160012, India
关键词
Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Steroids; Deflazacort; Six minute walk distance; Ambulation; 6-MINUTE WALK TEST; PREDNISONE; BOYS; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.04.004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: US food and drug administration has recently approved deflazacort for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and recommended the dosage of 0.9 mg/kg/d for patients aged >= 5years. However, data assessing the minimal efficacious dose and need of dose-titration based on age or disease severity is limited. Objective: To determine whether deflazacort 0.45 mg/kg/d (proposed lower dosage) is non-inferior to 0.9 mg/kg/ d among newly diagnosed patients with DMD. Method: A double-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized trial, conducted between December 2018 and July 2020. Newly diagnosed patient aged 5-15 years with genetic or muscle biopsy confirmed DMD and baseline 6-min walk distance (6MWD) > 150 m were screened. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified to prespecified subgroups by age (<7years and >7years), and baseline 6MWD (<350 m and >350 m), to receive either 0.45 mg/ kg/d or 0.9 mg/kg/d regimens. The primary endpoint was the change in 6MWD, from baseline to week-24 of intervention. The trial was powered with a predefined, non-inferiority margin of 30 m. The analyses were by modified intention-to-treat (mITT). Result: A total of 97 patients were enrolled, 40 receiving 0.45 mg/kg/d and 45 receiving 0.9 mg/kg/d deflazacort comprised of mITT population. For primary endpoint analysis the mean (SD) change in 6MWD from baseline to week-24 was 9.7 m (41.5) in deflazacort 0.45 mg/kg/d, and 34.7 m (43.5) for 0.9 mg/kg/d. The mean difference in change in 6MWD across the group was 24.8 m (95% CI 6.7 to 43, p value 0.008). The mean difference in change in 6MWD in the subgroups of boys <7 years of age was 21.8 m (95% CI -0.82, 44.5, p = 0.059), with baseline 6MWD of >350 m was 19.9 m (95% CI -2.4, 42.4; p = 0.08). The incidence of combined moderate to severe treatment-related adverse events was significant in the 0.9 mg/kg/d group by week 24 (odds ratio 0.36 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.89], p = 0.03). Discussion: The efficacy of proposed low dose deflazacort in comparison to the standard dose did not meet the prespecified criteria for non-inferiority. The low dose deflazacort was non-inferior in subgroup of patients with age <7 years and baseline 6MWD of >350 m. Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry-India Identifier: CTRI/2019/02/017388.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 84
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MILDRONATE VERSUS LEVOCARNITINE IN PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE: A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL
    Shu, M. Q.
    Song, Z. Y.
    Jing, T.
    Zhang, Q.
    Song, Y. M.
    Zhang, Y.
    Yang, C. M.
    Zhang, H.
    Yin, Y. H.
    Liu, D.
    Hao, Y. M.
    Liu, F.
    Zheng, Q.
    Xiao, J. F.
    Li, X. T.
    Fu, H.
    Chen, Y.
    She, B. R.
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 115 : 2 - 2
  • [32] Sublingual Misoprostol versus Intramuscular Oxytocin for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Uganda: A Double-Blind Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
    Atukunda, Esther C.
    Siedner, Mark J.
    Obua, Celestino
    Mugyenyi, Godfrey R.
    Twagirumukiza, Marc
    Agaba, Amon G.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (11)
  • [33] Ibuprofen versus pivmecillinam for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women-A double-blind, randomized non-inferiority trial
    Vik, Ingvild
    Bollestad, Marianne
    Grude, Nils
    Baerheim, Anders
    Damsgaard, Eivind
    Neumark, Thomas
    Bjerrum, Lars
    Cordoba, Gloria
    Olsen, Inge Christoffer
    Lindbaek, Morten
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (05)
  • [34] Safety and efficacy of tibolone in breast-cancer patients with vasomotor symptoms: a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial
    Kenemans, Peter
    Bundred, Nigel J.
    Foidart, Jean-Michel
    Kubista, Ernst
    von Schoultz, Bo
    Sismondi, Piero
    Vassilopoulou-Sellin, Rena
    Yip, Cheng Har
    Egberts, Jon
    Mol-Arts, Mirjam
    Mulder, Roel
    van Os, Steve
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2009, 10 (02): : 135 - 146
  • [35] Assessing the safety and efficacy of MNK-1411 in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study
    Due, B.
    Becker, P.
    Crawford, T.
    NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS, 2018, 28 : S65 - S65
  • [36] A MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTIPLE-DOSE STUDY ASSESSING THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF MNK-1411 IN PATIENTS WITH DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY
    Due, Bryan
    Becker, Patrice
    Crawford, Tom
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2018, 58 : S50 - S50
  • [37] Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of a Fixed Low-Dose Combination of Cinnarizine and Dimenhydrinate with Betahistine in Vestibular NeuritisA Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study
    Arne-Wulf Scholtz
    Raluca Steindl
    Nicole Burchardi
    Irene Bognar-Steinberg
    Wolfgang Baumann
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2012, 32 : 387 - 399
  • [38] Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of a Fixed Low-Dose Combination of Cinnarizine and Dimenhydrinate with Betahistine in Vestibular Neuritis A Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study
    Scholtz, Arne-Wulf
    Steindl, Raluca
    Burchardi, Nicole
    Bognar-Steinberg, Irene
    Baumann, Wolfgang
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2012, 32 (06) : 387 - 399
  • [39] Methods of defining the non-inferiority margin in randomized, double-blind controlled trials: a systematic review
    Turki A. Althunian
    Anthonius de Boer
    Olaf H. Klungel
    Widya N. Insani
    Rolf H. H. Groenwold
    Trials, 18
  • [40] Methods of defining the non-inferiority margin in randomized, double-blind controlled trials: a systematic review
    Althunian, Turki A.
    de Boer, Anthonius
    Klungel, Olaf H.
    Insani, Widya N.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    TRIALS, 2017, 18